RE: [xliff] Uniqueness of language pair

[Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>]

>> Nevertheless, I admit that language service 
>> providers may prefer multilingual XLIFF 
>> documents.
>
> No, I do not think so. The added synchronization 
> complexity would not fit well into workflows. 
> We would actually (see Fredrik’s comment earlier 
> today) prefer a bilingual standard.

+1 for bilingual.

I think LSPs do not want to get multilingual files and have few or no reason to send such files: they cause more troubles than they resolve.

-ys