[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: XLIFF 2.0 Sanity Check: Module owners to spedicify removal PRs, was Re: [xliff] 1.2 to 2.0 Gaps and Proposals
> ... A related issue occurred in the discussion between Yves and myself before TC
> made the decision on general PRs. Yves thought that it was absurd that only moduleAnd on that note David: Following that logic, since none of the modules has currently any PR stating a tool implementing the module can remove the element, technically, once added a module element cannot be removed ...ever. Even by the tool that placed it there.
> implementers can remove module, I argued that this is exactly what we wanted to
> achieve and this is what prevailed in the ballot.
That's the problem with "MUST preserve" at the default level: It forces you to define module-specific PRs where you can't possibly think about everything. That results in default PRs that are simply impossible to enforce.
But it's ok, I'm past spending time discussing it.
Have a good week-end,
-ys
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xliff-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xliff-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]