[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xliff] Re csprd01 comment 006 was: Fwd: what was our position on core, modules, extensions order in XLIFF 2.0?
Thanks David, I still think that according to our F2F discussion in London, <notes> needs to be removed from <segment> level as well. Just as an aside, is there any reason why <notes> doesn’t appear on <group> or <file> level? Isn’t it conceivable that you may want a comment that applies to
all <units> in a particular <group> or <file>? Otherwise, I think people may use <mda:metadata> to carry this information? Do we want that? From: Dr. David Filip [mailto:David.Filip@ul.ie]
Ryan, thanks for catching those omissions.., more details inline below.. The resulting proposed tree here:
| +--- | +--- | +--- | +--- | +--- | +--- | +--- At least one of ( | +--- | | | +--- At least one of ( | | | +--- | | | +--- | | | +---<any> * | +--- | | | +--- | | | | | +--- | | | | | +--- | | | | | +--- | | | | | | | +--- | | | | | | +--- | | | | | +--- | | | | | +--- | | | +--- | | | | | +--- | | | +--- | | | | | +--- | | | +--- | | | +--- | | | +--- | | | +--- | | | +--- | | | +---<any> * | +---<any> *
Dr. David Filip ======================= LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS University of Limerick, Ireland telephone: +353-6120-2781 cellphone: +353-86-0222-158 facsimile: +353-6120-2734 mailto:
david.filip@ul.ie On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Ryan King <ryanki@microsoft.com> wrote: Hi David, Fredrik, all, Just curious, but what is the rationale for enforcing an order of elements (sorry if I missed it
in a discussion somewhere)? IMHO there was no discussion, just that there traditionally was an enforced order of elements. Yves said in his comment that he does not see a reason to enforce order and I did not see (or missed) discussions pertaining to this comment. IMHO (supported by the view of our developers) having a standard order may make processing easier (and I do not mean processing as an internal format, as this is out of scope and I do not want to discuss that again) than in case all can
be anywhere. IMHO there are three general options, 1) say that order is always arbitrary [not sure how developers would like this, listing this just to be logically complete] 2) have always core > modules > extesnions and have modules order arbitrary 3) enforce canonical order - consistent on all levels The detailed proposal below is for option 3 we currently have option 4) i.e. canonical order with inconsistent order on different levels, which seems suboptimal
Good catch, Sean was not aware of this and I forgot to remove it
This also depends on the resegmentation discussion outcome. I beleieve that notes as a core element does not need to be necessarily removed, or at least it does not go automatically with the decision to dump modules and extensions
You are right, we should be consistent here
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]