RE: [xliff] Call for dissent: csprd02 129 ignorable and fs (RE: Call for dissent: csprd02 )

["Schnabel, Bryan S" <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com>]

Hi Yves,

 

I think David was not referring to the content of <ignorable>. I think he was talking about ignoring its content and just using its presence as a placeholder for an HTML preview formatting device. For example (admittedly clunky):

 

For this input:

 

<unit id="1" xmlns:fs="fs" fs:fs="p">

<segment>

  <source fs:fs="b">First sentence.</source>

  <target fs:fs="i">Première phrase.</target>

</segment>

<ignorable fs:fs="br">

  <source><!-- some RTF code "\par\par" --></source>

</ignorable>

<segment>

  <source fs:fs="b">Second sentence.</source>

</segment>

</unit>

 

Apply this XSL:

 

<xsl:template match="*" priority="2">

<xsl:choose>

  <xsl:when test="@fs:fs">

   <xsl:element name="{@fs:fs}">

    <xsl:apply-templates />

   </xsl:element>

  </xsl:when>

  <xsl:otherwise>

   <xsl:apply-templates />

  </xsl:otherwise>

 </xsl:choose>

</xsl:template>

 

<xsl:template match="comment()" priority="3" />

 

And get this preview:

 

<p>

   <b>First sentence.</b>

   <i>Première phrase.</i>

   <br/>

   <b>Second sentence.</b>

</p>

 

 

 

From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:06 PM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xliff] Call for dissent: csprd02 129 ignorable and fs (RE: Call for dissent: csprd02 )

 

Hi David,

 

If there is an HTML “<br/>” element in <ignorable> it better be in a <data> associated with a <ph>. And the <ph> can have an fs:fs.

 

Cheers,

-yves

 

 

From: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:xliff@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Dr. David Filip
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 12:39 PM
To: Schnabel, Bryan S
Cc: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [xliff] Call for dissent: csprd02 129 ignorable and fs (RE: Call for dissent: csprd02 )

 

Hi Bryan, Yves,

 

while I agree that there is no need for fs on em, becuase there will always be a corresponding sm within a unit to karry the fs info

 

Why not to have it on ignorable, the ignorable could e.g. be made <br/> or what not..

 

So sure the list needs to agree with the set of elements that actually allow it, but why not ignorable?

 

Cheers

dF 

Dr. David Filip

=======================

LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS

University of Limerick, Ireland

telephone: +353-6120-2781

cellphone: +353-86-0222-158

facsimile: +353-6120-2734

http://www.cngl.ie/profile/?i=452

mailto: david.filip@ul.ie

 

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Schnabel, Bryan S <bryan.s.schnabel@tektronix.com> wrote:

Just resending this with an improved Subject line to enhance findability. CFD unchanged.

 

From: Schnabel, Bryan S
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:23 PM
To: xliff@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Call for dissent: csprd02

 

I checked and Yves is correct <ignorable> and <em> do not have FS attributes. I propose removing them from the list of elements in the FS section.

 

If I do not receive dissent by the end of the week I will consider this approved.

 

Thanks,

 

Bryan

 

129: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xliff-comment/201310/msg00015.html

ignorable and fs

 

Hi all,

 

The section describing the fs:fs attribute says:

 

"Used in: <file>, <unit>, <ignorable>, <notes>, <note>, <originalData>, <data>, <cp>, <sc>, <ec>, <ph>, <pc>, <mrk>, <sm> and <em>."

 

It's incorrect: <ignorable>, <em> do not have fs attributes.

 

Regards,

-yves