Hello all,
I have a bad news WRT publication of the 4th Public Review.
Jano Husarčík from Moravia tested the new Schematron rule for non-reorderable sequences of codes and it transpires that the rule is now too strong. It also reports errors on some or most valid non-reorderable sentences.
Apologies for the bad project management, these tests should have of course been performed before our ballot earlier this week.
We can withdraw from the review by a full majority vote.
I believe that this is the most prudent thing to do at the moment.
If this proposal is seconded, I can set up the withdrawal ballot. which will run for 7 days. We will spend the time until the meeting of 16th May by testing the rules and also verifying of rules coverage to avoid similar disappointments in the future.
I will need to check with Chet if the next review will be considered 4th or 5th, but the bottom line is, I believe, we don't want to start this public review knowing that there is a material flaw in the core Schematron.
*Looking for opinions and/or seconding of the withdrawal ballot.*
The proposed ballot:
Title:
Withdraw the current XLIFF 2.1 draft from the 4th Public Review
Question:
Do you approve that csd04/scprd04 version of XLIFF Version 2.1 approved in the TC meeting on 2nd May be withdrawn from public review?
Description:
Full majority vote to withdraw from the currently requested public review..
Ballot Options: Yes, No, Abstain
Thanks
dF
Dr. David Filip
===========
OASIS XLIFF OMOS TC Chair
OASIS XLIFF TC Secretary, Editor, Liaison Officer
Spokes Research Fellow
ADAPT Centre
KDEG, Trinity College Dublin
Mobile: +420-777-218-122