[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (XLIFF-68) conformance clarification
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=67050#comment-67050 ] David Filip commented on XLIFF-68: ---------------------------------- There has been no discussion for a while The proposed resolution (won't fix) has been printed as cs01 candidate dated 01 August 2017. http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/xliff/trunk/xliff-21/xliff-core-v2.1-cs01.pdf Hereby a Call for Dissent is made. If no dissent is recorded by Saturday August 11, 2017 23:59 PDT, as a comment on this issue or as an email to the XLIFF mailing list xliff@lists.oasis-open.org referencing this Issue, the currently applied disposition will be deemed approved by consensus of the TC. > conformance clarification > ------------------------- > > Key: XLIFF-68 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/XLIFF-68 > Project: OASIS XML Localisation Interchange File Format (XLIFF) TC > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ITS Module > Affects Versions: 2.1_csprd04 > Environment: http://markmail.org/thread/jsdjodzfaym76kqz > Reporter: Yves Savourel > Assignee: David Filip > Priority: Minor > Labels: CFD, editorial > Fix For: 2.1_cs01 > > > In "5.9.4 Conformance to the ITS Module Specification" it says: > "Conformant Agents MUST be XLIFF Conformant in the sense of XLIFF Application > Conformance and also implement at least one [ITS] data > category defined in the section 'ITS data categories defined in the ITS Module' > of this ITS Module or provide full support for at > least one of the [ITS] custom annotations (ITS Mapping Annotations) specified in > the Section 'ITS data categories that have a > partial overlap with XLIFF features'." > In .the Section 'ITS data categories. "section" should be lowercase. > Why is the second part 'restricted' to annotations? It would be simpler and more > correct to say: > "Conformant Agents MUST be XLIFF Conformant in the sense of XLIFF Application > Conformance and also implement at least one [ITS] data > category defined in the section 'ITS data categories defined in the ITS Module' > or in the section 'ITS data categories that have a > partial overlap with XLIFF features'." > The current text makes it sound like it would be OK to support only the > annotation part of a data category. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]