[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri-editors] LDAP or DSML as local access protocol
I think we're talking about different things. I was simply asking how an XRI-identified endpoint might advertise that other local access services like LDAP or DSML were available at that endpoint, given that we have an element of the Identifier Authority Descriptor for doing this. I know that doesn't answer the question of how you would query for an XRI-identified resource USING such local access service. But since the endpoint at which the service is available MUST have an XRI, and it already has an Identifier Authority Descriptor for describing it, I guess I'm just asking why we are not providing the names of other common local access protocols as options, even if we say that the current spec does not define how to translate XRIs into queries in those protocols. =Drummond -----Original Message----- From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:gwachob@visa.com] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:05 AM To: Drummond Reed; XRI Editors (E-mail) Subject: RE: [xri-editors] LDAP or DSML as local access protocol Well, if you don't define the LDAP query, then you can't have any interoperability and therefore whats the purpose of "defining" an LDAP local access protocol? To put it concretely, if I have an XRI of "@example/foo.bar", and @example identifies a particular LDAP server, then what LDAP query do I perform? If thats not specified, then a local access protocol binding really hasn't been defined.. -Gabe > -----Original Message----- > From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@onename.com] > Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 12:37 AM > To: Wachob, Gabe; XRI Editors (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [xri-editors] LDAP or DSML as local access protocol > > > I agree that defining a translation would be useful, but it's not > actaully required, is it? Say I have an XRI for "@foo.bar" and then I > want to make an LDAP query about a distinguished name at the endpoint > identified by "@foo.bar". In that case I don't have to express that > distinguished name as an XRI, I just need to know is that LDAP is a > supported local access protocol at that endpoint, yes? > > =Drummond > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:gwachob@visa.com] > Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 8:32 PM > To: Drummond Reed; XRI Editors (E-mail) > Subject: RE: [xri-editors] LDAP or DSML as local access protocol > > Well, thats OK, but there a bit of work to do. We have to define how a > XRI gets translated into a LDAP or DSML query. This is not a > straightforward process, and there are probably a multitude of ways to > do it (an LDAP query is *structured* and I'm not sure how > that structure > is created). > > Does someone have a proposal for how to do this in a flexible way? > > -Gabe > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@onename.com] > > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 4:12 PM > > To: XRI Editors (E-mail) > > Subject: [xri-editors] LDAP or DSML as local access protocol > > > > > > Gabe, I forgot that one of my notes in first reading the resolution > > section was why LDAP or DSML wasn't included as an option > > alongside X2R > > as a local access protocol? This is in relation to 3.2.2 an 3.4. > > > > =Drummond > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri-editors/membe > rs/leave_workgroup.php. > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri-editors/membe rs/leave_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]