[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [xri] [Fwd: Re: Clarifying what a URL identifies (Four Uses of aURL)]
Bernard Vatant wrote: > Bottom line: a URL, like any other kind of character string, does not > identify any subject "per se", but can be used as an identifier if you > provide a clear and unambiguous identification process. And since > process can be different, the same string can be used different ways to > identify different things. This is not specific to URLs, it is the same > with whatever naming or identification system. "2003-01-24" is only a > character string, and it does not "per se" identify the current day, out > of context. > Yes, I agree with your conclusion. Also, reading the mind (map) of David Booth (http://www.w3.org/2002/11/dbooth-names/dbooth-rfc2396-analysis_clean.htm), reminds me of the recent debate of WHAT exactly the URI identifies (dirived through context, right? but wait...). Specifically http://www.w3.org/2002/11/dbooth-names/dbooth-rfc2396-analysis_clean.htm#question5 which (correctly) concludes that a URI can identify not only thing1 and thing2, but the binding (mapping) which relates thing1 TO thing2 (perhaps they are brothers :-). Leaving us with three identifiers for two subjects! I think that topic maps CAN express this, but i am presently less educated on the subject than i would like to be...(note to self). -- peterd
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC