Re: [xri] Glossary harmonization

[Peter C Davis <peter.davis@neustar.biz>]

a few IETF wg's come to mind as well:

- SIP wg
- ENUM ??
- namedroppers (esp in relation to RFC 3401-5 ... DDDS

--- peterd

Lindelsee, Mike wrote:

> Marc,
>
>  
>
> My list (with the caveat that there are many other efforts that we 
> could consider) would be:
>
>  
>
> 1.  SAML
>
> 2.  Topic Maps
>
> 3.  W3C Architecture
>
> 4.  Web Services
>
> 5.  Semantic Web
>
> 6.  Directory efforts (such as LDAP, UDDI, DSML, etc.)
>
> 7.  PKI (for terminology related to trust, etc.)
>
>  
>
> Mike
>
>  
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     *From:* Marc LeMaitre [mailto:Marc.LeMaitre@onename.com]
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:51 PM
>     *To:* xri@lists.oasis-open.org
>     *Subject:* [xri] Glossary harmonization
>
>     Hi all,
>
>      
>
>     During last week's face to face meetings I agreed to complete a
>     piece of work to compare and contrast the XRI TC glossary with
>     those of other related technologies, standards and protocols.
>
>      
>
>     I would like your feedback in the form a simple prioritized list
>     as to which you consider to be the most important for me to
>     consider. My goal is to provide an extension of our normative
>     glossary in the form of an informative glossary which details how
>     the XRI TC use of words and phrases compares to the same words,
>     phrases and concepts in other bodies of work. This should
>     ultimately make it easier for anyone reading our output to quickly
>     gain and appreciation for our approach to the problem space.
>
>      
>
>     I hope to have this work in initial draft form for distribution to
>     this list on Monday of next week (in time to get feedback on our
>     next conference call) so I would really appreciate a rapid response.
>
>      
>
>     Thanks
>
>      
>
>     Marc
>
>     703 926 1596
>