RE: [xri] Issue 1: Clarifying * Semantics

["Loren West" <loren.west@epok.net>]

Show us an example of an (HFI-based) XRI that
is any different as a result of this proposal.

I could see how you could be passionate about something
that a user would see, but that's not what we're talking about.

And for the small number of people who actually see MFI's,
the current syntax communicates the same thing in a much
less cluttered form.