[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Getting the temperature on Issue 1
Not sure what the Oasis or TC rules are for votes like this, but I agree that it would be nice to have a higher bar than just simple majority. Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: Loren West [mailto:loren.west@epok.net] > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 12:15 PM > To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xri] Getting the temperature on Issue 1 > > > I agree. Let's move on. > > Question to the "process" folks on the group: Should there > be somewhat more than a majority approval for changes that > break backward compatibility? > > It's not likely to affect the outcome of this issue, > but it helps ease the pain of being an early adopter. > It shows respect to those who have gone through the > pains of early adoption - that we won't just un-do > their work unless it's really necessary. > > It's important to me, to the management at Epok, and > for our customers to know where the XRI committee stands > on this issue. > > =Loren > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lindelsee, Mike [mailto:mlindels@visa.com] > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 11:36 AM > To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xri] Getting the temperature on Issue 1 > > > 2. Let's move on to other issues. > > Mike > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wachob, Gabe > > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 11:34 AM > > To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: [xri] Getting the temperature on Issue 1 > > > > > > I think we've done a very good job of sussing out the > > positions on Issue 1. > > > > Its also clear we haven't gotten anywhere towards consensus. > > > > My *personal feeling* is that the issue is that the proposed > > change doesn't affect the value or use of XRIs that much one > > way or the other. I think, for example, that the "*" issue > > may be a "bigger deal". > > > > If I were rating this issue in terms of relative importance > > (10 being a critical change that can add a lot of value (or > > do a lot of damage), 1 being a change that wouldn't), I'd > > rate it about 2. That is, even if I agreed with the value of > > the change, I'd estimate that the magnitude of the impact of > > the change to be 2 out of 10. > > > > For those who are active in this thread, what do you think? > > If this is a 2 or 3 out of 10 for the everyone, I'd say we > > should have a vote sooner and move on. If, on the other hand, > > there are strongly held feelings that this change is critical > > (or devastating), we can continue the discussion for a bit more. > > > > Just a straw poll - nothing formal. > > > > -Gabe > > > > __________________________________________________ > > gwachob@visa.com > > Chief Systems Architect > > Technology Strategies and Standards > > Visa International > > Phone: +1.650.432.3696 Fax: +1.650.554.6817 > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri/members/leave > > _workgroup.php. > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of the > OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri/members/leave > _workgroup.php > . > > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xri/members/leave > _workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]