[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Relative XRIs
I noticed the same thing in my review but
didn't flag it. The one place we diverge from IRI and URI is in the rules
around the opening "//". I would be in favor of realigning the XRI 2.0
rules so that for an absolute XRI: 1) "xri:" (the scheme name) is
optional, AND 2) IF an XRI starts with a GCS character,
then "//" is also optional (i.e., the scheme name plus the "//"
can be left off). If the XRI does not start with a GCS character, then
"//" is not optional. But by these rules the "//" can
always be included. Mike, is this cool with you? =Drummond From: Dave McAlpin
[mailto:Dave.McAlpin@epok.net] There’s probably a good reason for this, but why is
“//www.epok.net” a valid relative reference as a URI and IRI but
not as an XRI? |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]