RE: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump

["Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>]

Heard from a voice on high ...

yes :-)

Post-public review, the TC is allowed to make non-substantive changes, corrections, etc. and then vote to re-affirm CD status. This
happens before submitting the document to TC Admin for Standard vote. As long as the changes aren't deemed substantive, an
additional review period is not required. Do note, however, that should you deem the changes to be substantive, the new process
allows for a minimum 15-day review period, rather than the current 30-day minimum.

Regards,

Mary

---------------------------------------------------
Mary P McRae
OASIS 
Manager of TC Administration
email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org  
web: www.oasis-open.org 
phone: 603.232.9090
cell: 603.557.7985
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave McAlpin [mailto:Dave.McAlpin@epok.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 1:29 AM
> To: Peter C Davis; Drummond Reed
> Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump
> 
> If we consider it errata, are we allowed to fix it in 
> Appendix A after the public review but prior to the OASIS-wide vote?
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter C Davis [mailto:peter.davis@neustar.biz]
> Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 9:26 AM
> To: Drummond Reed
> Cc: Dave McAlpin; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump
> 
> esp. considering it is inconsistant within the same spec, i'd 
> concure w/drummond, that it is errata.
> 
> =peterd
> 
> Drummond Reed wrote:
> > I realize that Appendix A is normative, but this is simply errata.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > =Drummond
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > 
> > From: Dave McAlpin [mailto:Dave.McAlpin@epok.net]
> > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:44 PM
> > To: Drummond Reed; Wachob, Gabe; xri@lists.oasis-open.org; 
> > xri-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Are you sure it?s pure errata? I realize it?s easy enough to figure
> out 
> > what was intended, but it looks like a normative change to me.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Dave
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > 
> > From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2005 5:09 AM
> > To: 'Wachob, Gabe'; xri@lists.oasis-open.org; 
> > xri-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Speaking of erratta, in writing another document that 
> references the 
> > Syntax spec, I noticed that we forgot to roll one of the 
> final changes
> 
> > we made to the ABNF in the main doc into the collected ABNF in
> Appendix A.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > It's on line 852/3 it currently says:
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > xri-gen-delims    = ":" / "/" / "?" / "#" / "[" / "]" / "("
> >                   / ")" / "*" / gcs-char
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > It should match lines 223/4:
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >   xri-gen-delims   = ":" / "/" / "?" / "#" / "[" / "]" / "(" / ")"
> >                 / "*" / "!" / rgcs-char
> > 
> > This is pure erratta, but we need to roll it in too.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > =Drummond
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > 
> > From: Wachob, Gabe [mailto:gwachob@visa.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 12:47 PM
> > To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org; xri-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [xri] Comments from Jerome Jump
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > These don't sound like changes requiring a new draft, but if we do
> have 
> > a new draft, they should get integrated.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >     -Gabe
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > 
> > From: Jerome Jump [mailto:Jerome.Jump@epok.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:51 AM
> > To: Wachob, Gabe
> > Cc: Chetan Sabnis; Dave McAlpin
> > Subject: XRI Resolution V2.0
> > 
> > Gabe,
> > 
> >      In reviewing Committee Draft 01, 14 March 2005 of the 
> Extensible 
> > Resource Identifier (XRI) Resolution V2.0, I came across the
> following:
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 1)       On line 864:  I believe the constructed XRI should 
> be ?xri: 
> > //@example2?? instead of ?xri://=example2??.  This is because the 
> > external synonym (line 859) contains an ?@?, not an ?=?.  
> Or, change 
> > line 859 so that it says ?xri://=example2?.  In any case, the two
> should 
> > be consistent.
> > 
> > 2)       A lot of the XML, while correct, should be reformatted for 
> > easier reading by a human.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >      Other than that, the specs look pretty good.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > -Jerome M. Jump
> > 
> > Epok, Inc
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> > Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005
>  
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS 
> TC that generates this mail.  You may a link to this group 
> and all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
> oups.php 
> 
>