Re: [xri] Comments on WD10ED05

[Victor Grey <victor@idcommons.org>]

Wachob, Gabe wrote:
>  I think there needs to be a "resolution architecture" section like we 
> used to have in earlier drafts. Its really hard to understand how all 
> this stuff is supposed to hang together without at least something 
> like we used to have demonstrating the various phases of resolution

I strongly second this emotion. We need at least two example sections, 
one demonstrating the resolution of an XRI with a multi-subsegment 
authority section, and one demonstrating the resolution of an XRI with 
a path component, if we are to have any hope of being comprehensible to 
the uninitiated.

Also, section 4.2 introduces the term Query XRI (QXRI), but I can't 
find anywhere beforehand where this is defined. HXRI and QXRI are 
important concepts that need their own little section to clearly 
delineate their meaning.

=vg