RE: [xri] POLL: Syntax 2.0 or 2.1

["Gabe Wachob" <gabe.wachob@amsoft.net>]

Can you spell out the implications of this choice so we know exactly what it
is we are voting for/against? 

That is, we are saying that XREFs basically stay as is and that the 
@foo+bar+baz syntax goes away? 

	-Gabe

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tan, William [mailto:William.Tan@neustar.biz]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:25 PM
> To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [xri] POLL: Syntax 2.0 or 2.1
> 
> We did an informal poll at the f2f two weeks ago on whether we should
> stick with XRI Syntax 2.0. I suggest we vote again on the list.
> 
> +1 - to support concatenated syntax
> 0 - don't care
> -1 - no concatenated syntax
> 
> I'm reverting my vote to -1 because the solution is too confusing IMHO.
> 
> =wil