[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xri] POLL: Syntax 2.0 or 2.1
Yes. Xrefs can only appear within parentheses. Gabe Wachob wrote: > Can you spell out the implications of this choice so we know exactly what it > is we are voting for/against? > > That is, we are saying that XREFs basically stay as is and that the > @foo+bar+baz syntax goes away? > > -Gabe > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tan, William [mailto:William.Tan@neustar.biz] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:25 PM >> To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org >> Subject: [xri] POLL: Syntax 2.0 or 2.1 >> >> We did an informal poll at the f2f two weeks ago on whether we should >> stick with XRI Syntax 2.0. I suggest we vote again on the list. >> >> +1 - to support concatenated syntax >> 0 - don't care >> -1 - no concatenated syntax >> >> I'm reverting my vote to -1 because the solution is too confusing IMHO. >> >> =wil >> > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]