RE: [xri] POLL: Syntax 2.0 or 2.1

["Gabe Wachob" <gabe.wachob@amsoft.net>]

By 'stay as is', I mean relative to syntax 2.0... 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gabe Wachob [mailto:gabe.wachob@amsoft.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:31 PM
> To: 'Tan, William'; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: RE: [xri] POLL: Syntax 2.0 or 2.1
> 
> Can you spell out the implications of this choice so we know exactly what
> it
> is we are voting for/against?
> 
> That is, we are saying that XREFs basically stay as is and that the
> @foo+bar+baz syntax goes away?
> 
> 	-Gabe
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tan, William [mailto:William.Tan@neustar.biz]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 3:25 PM
> > To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: [xri] POLL: Syntax 2.0 or 2.1
> >
> > We did an informal poll at the f2f two weeks ago on whether we should
> > stick with XRI Syntax 2.0. I suggest we vote again on the list.
> >
> > +1 - to support concatenated syntax
> > 0 - don't care
> > -1 - no concatenated syntax
> >
> > I'm reverting my vote to -1 because the solution is too confusing IMHO.
> >
> > =wil