[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: WD11 Section 8 (Yadis) proposed text
Drummond, Yes. I think we should state that for the sake of completeness. Maybe it is just me, but I always tend to think of "Normal Case" and "Abnormal Case" and feel very incomplete if one of them is missing. Regards, Nat > -----Original Message----- > From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net] > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 8:47 AM > To: 崎村 夏彦 > Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: WD11 Section 8 (Yadis) proposed text > > Nat, > > The Yadis spec at yadis.org > (http://yadis.org/papers/yadis-v1.0.pdf) does not specify any > HTTP(S) success or failure codes. The reasons (as I remember > them) were: a) it's just standard HTTP(S), so all the > standard HTTP(S) error codes apply, and b) if the HTTP(S) > server you are talking to doesn't know anything about XRDS > documents, it's simply going to give you standard HTTP > response codes anyway. > > I suppose we could add a sentence saying that the standard > HTTP response codes defined in RFC 2616 apply. Would that help? > > =Drummond > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:n-sakimura@nri.co.jp] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 12:09 AM > To: Drummond Reed > Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: WD11 Section 8 (Yadis) proposed text > > Hi. > > Don't we need to specify the HTTP status code for both > success and failure? > Also, what should be returned for the failure case, > especially when HEAD request was used? > > Nat > > On 2007/05/21, at 15:01, Drummond Reed wrote: > > > XRI TC Members and Observers: > > > > > > > > In keeping with the consensus from last week to make our highest > > priority the completion of the XRI Resolution 2.0 spec, we are > > plunging into review of Working Draft 11 this week. The ball for > > posting the first editor's draft is in my court, and I have > > reserved all day Tuesday for completing it so review can begin > > Wednesday before our standard TC telecon this coming Thursday. > > > > > > > > However one section is ready for review immediately - the new > > section 8, which is where we are incorporating the Yadis > > specification for discovery of XRDS document from an HTTP URI. > > Since we need the Yadis and OpenID communities to review this > > carefully, I have posted the proposed text of this section > as a new > > XRI TC wiki page at: > > > > > > > > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriCd02/ > > XrdsDiscoveryFromHttpUris > > > > > > > > I would like to post a request for review to the OpenID > > Specification mailing list tomorrow (Monday) night after the XRI > > Resolution editors and other TC members have had a chance > to review > > it. So please do look this over tomorrow if you can - it's only > > about 1 page of text - and post any and all feedback to the list > > (even if it's just to say +1). > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > =Drummond > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]