RE: [xri] CanonicalID verification text for section 11.

["Gabe Wachob" <gabe.wachob@amsoft.net>]

But in the case of authority merge, you would say, the canonical id’s from the two authorities should be of the same priority then?

 

            -Gabe

 

---

From: Steven Churchill [mailto:steven.churchill@xdi.org]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 2:32 PM
To: 'Gabe Wachob'; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xri] CanonicalID verification text for section 11.

 

Gabe,

 

The text intends to say this: only the highest priority CanonicalIDs are validated under Canonical ID verification. (Note that there may be more than one with the same highest priority, and if so, they are all validated.)

 

There may be other lower-priority Canonical IDs as well, but these are not validated under Canonical ID verification. These would be present, for example, in the case of an authority merge.

 

~ Steve

 

 

---

From: Gabe Wachob [mailto:gabe.wachob@amsoft.net]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2007 12:53 PM
To: 'Steven Churchill'; xri@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xri] CanonicalID verification text for section 11.

 

Question:

 

1)   In reading the first page, it looks like there is only one canonical ID ever legally allowed in an XRD (the one with the highest priority) – I thought the point was that canonical ID verification would result in a legal CanonicalID and depending on how you got to the XRD, a specific CanonicalID would be “verified” or not, depending on the resolution path to get to the XRD. This is unrelated to “priority” attribute. Are you saying this is NOT the case?

 

 

 

---

From: Steven Churchill [mailto:steven.churchill@xdi.org]
Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2007 1:59 PM
To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [xri] CanonicalID verification text for section 11.

 

Drummond,

 

Attached are my changes for section 11.

 

I still owe the changes for Appendix E. (These are small.)

 

~ Steve