OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xri message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [xri] Use of the word "synonym" in section 10


 

Les,

 

Yes we agree that the term in used too often. In my view, I’m trying to eliminate it its use outside of model that clearly establishes its definition.

 

And thus I find myself needing to be somewhat pedantic in my response.

 

> from your examples, IMHO =steve.churchill and =steven.churchill and the CID

> that goes with it are synonymous because they are the same identity. 

 

These identifiers cannot be synonymous outside of a model constituting the definition of synonymity and identity. For example, three separate models were presented in my previous email to Markus. The identifiers above may be synonyms in all, some, or none of these models. So I disagree with you saying that “they are synonymous”. This has no meaning to me outside you first establishing the model.

 

> @ootao*steve is a reference that may be the same person but no one can know that

> for sure except you.  It is just a reference between two authorities.

> I don’t really care if you want to call a reference a synonym I just find that that term is used to often.

 

In none of my examples did I say that @ootao*steve was contained in the value of an xrd:Ref. If I we’re to establish a reference to @ootao*steve, I would probably opt to use its CID in the xrd:Ref element anyway.

 

I think that what you are getting at here is that the value contained in a Ref element could be thought of as a “synonym” under some particular model of synonymity. Perhaps so, but if that is how the Resolution Spec decides to employ the term, well, then that is quite unfortunate, because it prevents or greatly discourages using the term where it actually provides some real value (such as within the context of describing the Canonical ID Verification model.)

 

In the context that you suggest (and which the Resolution Spec currently employs), the term only serves to confuse.

 

~ Steve

 

 

 


From: Steven Churchill [mailto:steven.churchill@xdi.org]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 3:42 PM
To: Chasen, Les
Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [xri] Use of the word "synonym" in section 10

 

Les,

 

> I agree.  I think the word ‘synonym’ has been overused.  IMHO, It should be reserved

> for inames and inumbers that are in the same XRD.

 

I think that you are saying that a value of a CanonicalID is synonymous with the value of LocalID is synonymous with the value of a Ref is synonymous with the value of a Query given that the values show up in the same XRD.

 

This definition of “synonym” has no practical value that I can see. On the other hand, the property of XRI identifier synonymity is one of XRI Resolution’s most valuable features. I would hate to “lose” the use of the term by associating it with your meaning above.

 

~ Steve

 

 

 


From: markus.sabadello@gmail.com [mailto:markus.sabadello@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Markus Sabadello
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:15 AM
To: Steven Churchill
Cc: xri@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [xri] Use of the word "synonym" in section 10

 


I know it's more complicated than that: But from my naive point of view two XRI identifiers are synonyms if for all possible input parameters they return the same SEP(s).

Markus

On 6/8/07, Steven Churchill <steven.churchill@xdi.org> wrote:

Drummond,

 

I don't understand the use of the term "synonym" in section 10.

 

In English, if two words are synonyms, then they have the same (or roughly the same) meaning. In the Identify field, if two identifiers are synonyms, then they refer to the same identity.

 

As I try to express in my text for section 11, these concepts are dependent upon the "model" (or "system") defining the notions of synonymity and identity. In a Banking system, identifiers may include a person's name(s) and account number. In that same model, identity may be defined as "the human being person having a given SSN and DOB". (Don't get confused by the fact that a SSN is also a type of identifier. That is incidental to the model. We are talking here about establishing the definition of identity. Once that is done, then Steven Churchill and Steve Churchill can be synonymous identifiers for the same identity.) In the XRI Canonical ID Verification model, there is a clear notion of synonymity and absolute identity. In any case, the model needs to be formally defined before we can start referring to this thing or that thing as a being a synonym. A synonym to what?

 

Section 10 introduces the term synonym without establishing a model that defines either synonymity or identity. As Gabe and others have correctly pointed out, XRI supports many such models. What are synonyms within one model are not necessarily synonyms within another model.

 

It is not helpful to use the term synonym outside a model defining how two identifiers get mapped to the same identity.

 

~ Steve

 

 




--
@freeXRI / freexri.com / try free i-names



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]