[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Agenda: XRI TC Telecon 10-11AM PT Thursday 2008-06-05
Bill, apologies on that – as you
heard on the call, we didn’t have enough ports reserved. Les has raised
the number of ports for future calls, A big thanks again to Les and NeuStar for
hosting our telecons. =Drummond From: Barnhill,
William [USA] [mailto:barnhill_william@bah.com] I cannot join, it says the conferencing
system is full. Any fix? Bill Barnhill Associate (XML, Emerging Technologies, Web Services, Java, Ruby) Booz | Allen | Hamilton mailto:barnhill_william@bah.com phone:+1.315.330.7386 // +1.315.491.6765 (cell) i-name: xri://=Bill.Barnhill From: Drummond
Reed Nat, thanks very much for taking the time to send this. I know the
current call timing does not work for you. This may be something that the TC
needs to revisit again – as you know it is a very difficult problem since
we have TC members on all continents. I will try to make sure your inputs are reflected in the minutes. =Drummond From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:n-sakimura@nri.co.jp] As it happens to be 2:00AM JST, I think I am not going to make it,
so here is what I think. Following is the agenda for the unofficial telecon of the XRI TC at:
Date: Thursday, 05 June 2008 USA Time: 10:00AM - 11:00PM Pacific Time
TO ACCESS THE AUDIO CONFERENCE: Dial In Number: 571-434-5750 Conference ID: 5474
AGENDA
1) DISCUSSION OF NEXT STEPS FOLLOWING XRI 2.0 VOTE
Our first agenda item will be to continue the discussion started on Monday's special telecon about the next steps the TC will take following the vote. Specific questions we want to answer as part of this conversation:
a) How soon do we want to take the XRI specifications to another vote?
This depends on how long W3C want to take for dialogue. Perhaps 6
months?
b) What level of changes in the specs do we anticipate making first?
For Syntax:
c) What other companies or individuals do we want to get involved?
Perhaps:
d) What other adoption avenues do we want to pursue in that period?
Make a compelling beta apps and deploy them to appeal to the
general public for its utility.
e) What non-normative materials do we want to produce in that period?
- XRI benefits on OpenID
2) OASIS COMMUNICATION ON XRI VOTE
OASIS News will carry a short article on the results of the vote. Based on our discussion above, what points do we think it important to include? In addition, do we believe that OASIS should make a public communication about the vote? If so, what points should that include?
At least, IMHO it should include:
3) XRI TC COMMUNICATION WITH OASIS VOTERS
Several people have recommended we communicate with all voters -- Yes and No -- thanking them for taking part and making it clear what our next steps will be. We will determine and assign this action item.
This is a good idea. Especially for "No" voters to
collect what they did not like about XRI.
4) NEXT STEPS WITH W3C TAG
Again, in the context of the conclusions above, what specific next steps and outreach do we want to make to W3C TAG? Note that this is on the agenda of their meeting on Friday:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008Jun/0026.html
To me, what TAG was concerned technically has always been a bit
vague.
5) WIKIPEDIA PAGE ON XRI
The neutrality of the XRI page on Wikipedia has been placed under dispute, including specifically the licensing section. This has been correct by XRI TC members several times in the past. See the Talk page at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Extensible_Resource_Identifier
We will discuss with OASIS Staff the best way to proceed with ensuring that errors are corrected and the information on this page is neutral and factual.
Licensing thing is a fact. Neutrality is about the interpretation.
Fact is fact. To state the fact, neutrality is not necessary.
Nat Sakimura (=nat) Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]