Re: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: Draft of XRI-As-Relative-URI page

[<njones@ouno.com>]

All:

Does the XRI need to also be the first path... It's written as, "first
character of the path," so is it the first character of the first path?

would it be more appropriate to write it

*.{TLD}/{XRI}

where {TLD} is any Top Level Domain (.net, .com, .org, etc.) and the
{XRI}is any valid XRI?

Also for FTP (and FTPS and SFTP I presume) how does the resolution happen?
Would you need a special server listening to port 21 or 990? Or am I
getting confused as to where the FTP is placed. Is the following valid: 

ftp://xri.net/@example*run

Nika


On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:05:31 -0700, "Drummond Reed"
<drummond.reed@cordance.net> wrote:
> XRI TC Members and Observers:
> 
> 
> 
> Per my action item from the last telecon, I have posted a first draft
wiki
> page describing the XRI-As-Relative-URI proposal to:
> 
> 
> 
>             http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriAsRelativeUri
> 
> 
> 
> The next step is for TC members to review and comment on this page. As
> always, being a wiki, feel free to just go in and edit the page. Or, if
> you
> prefer, send feedback or question to the list.
> 
> 
> 
> The goal is to incorporate any feedback by Wednesday so we can begin
> sending
> messages to the W3C TAG public mailing list to solicit feedback there
> before
> our next telecon this coming Thursday.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> 
> =Drummond