Re: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: Draft of XRI-As-Relative-URI page

[John Bradley <jbradley@mac.com>]

We need to make it clear that there is also a requirement for applications to recognize our sub scheme for http:,  so that external processing applications can be triggered as they would be with a URI scheme.

Do we want to call this XRI 2.1 or 3.0?

Perhaps we should describe the bindings as bindings for proxy meta data discovery.

There is still a native discovery protocol XRI 2.0 resolution.

=jbradley

On 14-Oct-08, at 12:05 AM, Drummond Reed wrote:

XRI TC Members and Observers:

 

Per my action item from the last telecon, I have posted a first draft wiki page describing the XRI-As-Relative-URI proposal to:

 

            http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriAsRelativeUri

 

The next step is for TC members to review and comment on this page. As always, being a wiki, feel free to just go in and edit the page. Or, if you prefer, send feedback or question to the list.

 

The goal is to incorporate any feedback by Wednesday so we can begin sending messages to the W3C TAG public mailing list to solicit feedback there before our next telecon this coming Thursday.

 

Thanks,

 

=Drummond

smime.p7s