RE: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: Draft of XRI-As-Relative-URI page

Are we doing away with xri: altogether?

Is it still ok to refer to an XRI as =les or does it have to start with a scheme in which a binding exists?

http://xri.net, and all of it’s proposed forms, are still considered a proxy server, right? Is there any changes to where authority resolution servers should reside? If no, is there confusion introduced by having at.xri.net and equal.xri.net?

Given this plan to change from a pattern of deducing a HXRI from ‘xri.*’ to something like ‘*.xri’ or ‘*.xri.net’ how does one bring up their own proxy. Would I be breaking with compliance if I ran a proxy at proxy.chasen.us? What about running my own authority resolution server at auth.chasen.us?

Have we ever determined a criteria for new schemes?

From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 3:06 AM
To: 'OASIS XRI TC'
Subject: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: Draft of XRI-As-Relative-URI page

XRI TC Members and Observers:

Per my action item from the last telecon, I have posted a first draft wiki page describing the XRI-As-Relative-URI proposal to:

http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XriAsRelativeUri

The next step is for TC members to review and comment on this page. As always, being a wiki, feel free to just go in and edit the page. Or, if you prefer, send feedback or question to the list.

The goal is to incorporate any feedback by Wednesday so we can begin sending messages to the W3C TAG public mailing list to solicit feedback there before our next telecon this coming Thursday.

Thanks,

=Drummond

xri message