[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: Draft of XRI-As-Relative-URI page
Just a couple of quick thoughts: .. XRI resolution should be adaptable to non-http. I realize that's not currently supported, but should be IMHO. Please be careful that the changes you are making based on W3C feedback do not lock it totally to HTTP. .. That said, if for the majority using HTTP you don't just have the URL to play with. The accepts header seems a good use for the version (the client specifies the versions it understands, the proxy returns the highest version the client understands). This also means URL links people have coded/made will not break when you version ('Cool URLs' and all that). Thanks, Bill From: Nika Jones
Sent: Tue 10/14/2008 11:54 PM To: OASIS XRI TC Subject: Re: [xri] PLEASE REVIEW: Draft of XRI-As-Relative-URI page With XRI 3.0 around the corner, would it be prudent to add a version to the sub-scheme?
or
Nika
On Oct 14, 2008, at 6:09 PM, John Bradley wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]