Re: [xri] Question on Tags and Cross References

There's an experimental parser of that proposed 3.0 syntax at http://testxri.com/tools/XRIInspector3/

Markus

On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:15 PM, John Bradley <jbradley@mac.com> wrote:

=nika+contact is a proposed XRI 3.0 direct concatenation

The proper 2.0 syntax would be =nika/(+contact)

I am guessing that you intend +contact to be in the XRI path and not a authority sub segment?

=jbradley

On 15-Oct-08, at 10:04 AM, Nika Jones wrote:

Is there any difference between:

=nika+contact and =nika(+contact)

It seems I've seen the two in the wild... and I'm wondering if there is a difference or not?

Nika

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

xri message