[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [xri] GCS Characters
Well thats a can of worms:) I think in Drummonds proposal + and $ also get to have XRD. In the first segment the only place those symbols formerly known as GCS would have there conventional meaning is if they are attached to the first sub segment. If they are the leading character of any other subsegment they would be treated as * and the =, +, $ are only inferences to the global concept. Remember I am the one opposed to the change unless there is a good reason. So take any pro things I say with a grain of salt. The thing is that under that they will be treated as sub segments by the authority server, so what gets passed? For =drummond@microsoft.com the first subsegment is =drummond what is the second that get passed to =drummonds's authority service? @microsoft.com *(@microsoft.com) microsoft.com So would =drummond*microsoft.com produce the same XRD as =drummond@microsoft.com? Could go ether way depending on how we define resolution. Yes having =drummond+phone have its own XRD seems sort of funky to me as well. John B. On 24-Nov-08, at 10:23 AM, Victor Grey wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]