OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

xri message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [xri] XRD trusted discovery workflow


--Apple-Mail-194--212679489
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary=Apple-Mail-193--212679759


--Apple-Mail-193--212679759
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	format=flowed;
	delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Nat,

SubjectAltName  can have multiple elements so I suppose a single cert  
could service multiple CID, as it can for email addresses.

I am not certain what you mean by unique name.  From a AWWW  
perspective every URI represents a unique resource so that probably is  
not what you are getting at.

The qualities of the email or URI in the SubjectAltName would be  
determined by the CA's policy.

We may need some new use policy in the CERT to prevent confusion with  
email or other certs issued for different reasons under different  
vetting policies.

=jbradley
On 15-Dec-08, at 4:18 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote:

> Ah!
>
> My comments inline.
>
> Peter Davis wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2008, at 6:13 PM, Sakimura Nat wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That is, if it were http://example.com/alice and http://example.com/bob
>>> , then it should be example.com that signs this.
>>>
>>
>> I am not sure that I agree completely on this for all cases.  take,
>> for example:
>>
>>        https://example.com/foo/alice
>>
>> It is entirely plausible that the naming authority is /foo (not
>> example.com).  Similarly, for:
>>
>>        https://foo.example.com/foo/alice
>>
>> the naming authority _could_ be any of:
>>
>>        foo.example.com/foo
>>        foo.example.com
>>        example.com
>>
>> all of which should be considered valid
>>
> Indeed. The above sentence was the summarization of Brian's approach.
> Like John has explained, my approach differs that I believe each  
> identity should have a cert.
>
> In that path, the current discussion is whether to revive  
> SubjectUniqueId or use SubjectAltName.
> As long as there is a way to know that SubjectAltName indeed is a  
> unique name, I am fine with it.
>
>> =peterd
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php


--Apple-Mail-193--212679759
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; =
-webkit-line-break: after-white-space; =
">Nat,<div><br></div><div>SubjectAltName &nbsp;can have multiple =
elements so I suppose a single cert could service multiple CID, as it =
can for email addresses.</div><div><br></div><div>I am not certain what =
you mean by unique name. &nbsp;=46rom a AWWW perspective every URI =
represents a unique resource so that probably is not what you are =
getting at.</div><div><br></div><div>The qualities of the email or URI =
in the SubjectAltName would be determined by the CA's =
policy.</div><div><br></div><div>We may need some new use policy in the =
CERT to prevent confusion with email or other certs issued =
for&nbsp;different&nbsp;reasons under&nbsp;different&nbsp;vetting =
policies.</div><div><br></div><div>=3Djbradley<br><div><div>On =
15-Dec-08, at 4:18 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote:</div><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><div>Ah!<br><br>My comments inline.<br><br>Peter Davis =
wrote:<br><blockquote type=3D"cite">On Dec 11, 2008, at 6:13 PM, =
Sakimura Nat wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"> =
&nbsp;<br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">That is, if it were <a =
href=3D"http://example.com/alice";>http://example.com/alice</a> and <a =
href=3D"http://example.com/bob";>http://example.com/bob</a><br></blockquote=
></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><blockquote type=3D"cite"> , =
then it should be example.com that signs =
this.<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"> =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">I am not sure =
that I agree completely on this for all cases. =
&nbsp;take,<br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">for =
example:<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"> =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a =
href=3D"https://example.com/foo/alice";>https://example.com/foo/alice</a><b=
r></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite">It is entirely plausible that the naming authority is /foo =
(not<br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">example.com). =
&nbsp;Similarly, for:<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"> =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a =
href=3D"https://foo.example.com/foo/alice";>https://foo.example.com/foo/ali=
ce</a><br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">the naming =
authority _could_ be any of:<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"> =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;foo.example.com/foo<br></blockqu=
ote><blockquote type=3D"cite"> =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;foo.example.com<br></blockquote>=
<blockquote type=3D"cite"> =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;example.com<br></blockquote><blo=
ckquote type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite">all of =
which should be considered valid<br></blockquote><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"> &nbsp;<br></blockquote>Indeed. The above sentence was the =
summarization of Brian's approach.<br>Like John has explained, my =
approach differs that I believe each identity should have a =
cert.<br><br>In that path, the current discussion is whether to revive =
SubjectUniqueId or use SubjectAltName.<br>As long as there is a way to =
know that SubjectAltName indeed is a unique name, I am fine with =
it.<br><br><blockquote type=3D"cite">=3Dpeterd<br></blockquote><blockquote=
 type=3D"cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type=3D"cite"> =
&nbsp;<br></blockquote><br>-----------------------------------------------=
----------------------<br>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must =
leave the OASIS TC that<br>generates this mail. &nbsp;Follow this link =
to all your TCs in OASIS at:<br><a =
href=3D"https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups=
.php">https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.p=
hp</a> <br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail-193--212679759--

--Apple-Mail-194--212679489
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=smime.p7s
Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature;
	name=smime.p7s
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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==

--Apple-Mail-194--212679489--


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]