RE: [xri] OASIS spec template

["Drummond Reed" <drummond.reed@cordance.net>]

Eran, that's fine as long as we convert it into one of the OASIS spec
template formats (http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/) before we vote it
to a Committee Draft. (I know OASIS would prefer that Working Drafts use the
OASIS template format, but I don't think there's any hard-and-fast rule
about that.)

=Drummond 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eran Hammer-Lahav [mailto:eran@hueniverse.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 5:10 PM
> To: Drummond Reed; 'Will Norris'; 'XRI TC'
> Subject: RE: [xri] OASIS spec template
> 
> We'll start with the IETF xml2rfc format and take it from there since it
> is easy to convert to HTML or any other format.
> 
> EHL
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Drummond Reed [mailto:drummond.reed@cordance.net]
> > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 4:37 PM
> > To: 'Will Norris'; 'XRI TC'
> > Subject: RE: [xri] OASIS spec template
> >
> > Wil,
> >
> > I just updated that page to reflect Mary McRae's (our TC administrator)
> > feedback about spec filenames (all those listed on the page are now
> > correct).
> >
> > However, on the question of what OASIS template is preferred, you're
> > correct
> > that no decision has been made yet for XRD 1.0. (The decision was made
> > for
> > XRI 3.0 spec and the XRI 3.0 Binding specs -- which is to use MS Word
> > for
> > legacy reasons.)
> >
> > But for the XRI 1.0 spec, it is editor's choice. So you and Eran (and
> > any
> > other editors) should discuss it and choose whichever of the OASIS
> > templates
> > you feel will work best for you.
> >
> > Note Mary's advice on that page, though: DO start fresh with a new
> > current
> > OASIS template, whichever one you choose, and don't try to adapt an
> > existing
> > document.
> >
> > Feel free to post questions here as you go - I too am working on XRI
> > 3.0
> > spec editing this week.
> >
> > =Drummond
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Will Norris [mailto:Will@willnorris.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 1:47 PM
> > > To: XRI TC
> > > Subject: [xri] OASIS spec template
> > >
> > > judging by this page[0], no decision was made as to what OASIS
> > > template is preferred to be authoritative for XRI.  Can we go ahead
> > > and decide on that?  I don't have very strong feelings one way or the
> > > other toward any of them.  I do like the idea of using a non-binary
> > > format, so that we can make use of traditional version control
> > > systems, but can go with whatever.
> > >
> > > -will
> > >
> > > [0]: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/InfoForEditors
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> > > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> > > https://www.oasis-
> > open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php