[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: XML DSig
I'm sure this must have been discussed before, but it was before I got involved with the TC. Why are we not using XML DSig for signing XRD? I just got off a Shibboleth call where we were discussing the scope of work for adding OpenID and XRD support to Shibboleth, and several people (Scott Cantor included, of course) asked why weren't using XML DSig. I didn't actually know the answer. I've certainly wondered that myself, but kinda took it at face value that there was a good reason. Is there? Is it really just that XML Canonicalization is "too hard"? If that's it, then isn't the answer to just write better libraries ONCE and be done with it? Was there something else brought up in past discussions? If there is a good reason, that's fine... I'd just be a little embarrassed (especially as a developer) if all we have is "it's too hard". -will
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]