[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Re: Proposal for XRD 1.0 signing to use constrained XML dSig
Dirk Balfanz wrote on 2009-05-31: > Ok, the last one is more of an opinions, I guess: > > - incorporating a SAML library for the purpose of getting the SAML XML > dSig mechanism into our step2 library (which does some proof-of-concept > XRDS signature verification) would probably have been more work than the > two lines of code it takes to generate and/or verify the signatures > without any canonicalization (see > http://wiki.oasis-open.org/xri/XrdOne/XmlDsigProfile). I think I misread your last point, sorry. We don't do the signing in our SAML library because it's a lower level feature. Looking at your proposal there, I don't really know off-hand how likely it is that I could reuse existing implementations to meet it. I'd certainly have to write a lot more than two lines of code to do it. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]