Re: [xri] Subject and Alias

[Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>]

Just thought that there might be a use case to have uuid, isbn, or something
as Alias etc. By relative, I meant without protocol or authority section.
Uuid, isbn, etc. would fall into this category.

(Of course, we can define purl.org etc. uri for those, but it may have
  trust section implications that I have not fully explored.)

=nat

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Eran Hammer-Lahav" <eran@hueniverse.com>
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 8:19 PM
To: "Sakimura Nat" <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>; <xri@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [xri] Subject and Alias

> It is easier to parse because you get the full URI and a relative URI 
> would be relative to what?
>
> EHL
>
>
> On 6/8/09 4:03 AM, "Nat Sakimura" <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp> wrote:
>
> In the current version of the xrd-1.0.xml, Subject and Alias is defined to
> be type xs:anyURI and it MUST be an absolute URI. Does it really have to 
> be
> an absolute URI or could it be relative?
>
> If it has to be an absolute URI, what is the rationale behind it?
>
> =nat
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>
>