Re: [xri] Subject and Alias

[Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>]

These are URNs, and not URIs, are they? 
As URNs are not URIs, they fall out of the MUST requirement for 
Subject and Alias being Absolute URI of type xs:anyURI. 
Essentially, that was what I was pointing out. 

#purl.org was a joke. You know I do not like the idea, do not you John? 

=nat

--------------------------------------------------
From: "John Bradley" <jbradley@mac.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 4:58 AM
To: "Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>
Cc: "Sakimura Nat" <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>; <xri@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: Re: [xri] Subject and Alias

> Please not purl.org.
> 
> urn:isbn  etc
> 
> or if you must info:oclcnum/    For Worldcat  and others.
> 
> John B.
> 
> On 8-Jun-09, at 10:37 AM, Scott Cantor wrote:
> 
> Nat Sakimura wrote on 2009-06-08:
> Just thought that there might be a use case to have uuid, isbn, or
> something
> as Alias etc. By relative, I meant without protocol or authority section.
> Uuid, isbn, etc. would fall into this category.
> 
> UUIDs have a URN namespace defined, as do OIDs and ISBN.
> 
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/
> 
> (Of course, we can define purl.org etc. uri for those, but it may have
> trust section implications that I have not fully explored.)
> 
> Please don't.
> 
> -- Scott
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 
> 
>