[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Delegation Terminology / Linked XRD
My point is that if you draw a graph of the resource and all its links from the various sources and XRDs, it looks like you should flatten the content of XRDs, not search them in order... EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Will Norris [mailto:will@willnorris.com] > Sent: Friday, July 03, 2009 11:25 PM > To: XRI TC > Subject: Re: [xri] Delegation Terminology / Linked XRD > > > On Jul 3, 2009, at 5:11 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > > >> Well there is a precedence. Even though a XRD-linked XRD shares the > >> semantics as one linked from an HTTP header, we can't ignore the > fact > >> that <Link> elements do in fact have a priority. I remember that > >> LRDD > >> specifically stated that determining which one of multiple > >> describedby > >> links should be used was application specific. And that seems to > >> make > >> sense because there is no good deterministic way to order them. We > >> can order <Link> elements though, so it makes sense to respect their > >> order. > > > > I agree that Link priority must take precedence but that's the easy > > case. What happens when all priorities are equal. > > > If a linked XRD is really just another linked resource, then the spec > instructs consuming applications to choose randomly. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]