[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16
> -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 7:08 PM > To: xri@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: RE: [xri] Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday > 2009-07-16 > > Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2009-07-27: > > I suggest we stick to an attribute of <Subject> over a new element > > <SubjectSet> because the only reason for a new element is to make > > the content of the element a string (and not a URI). But if we do > > that, > it > > becomes impossible to apply a *generic* trust profile to it because > it no > > longer plays by the same rules <Subject> does (with a URI and an > obvious > > authority section). This means if we create a new element, we need > > to explicitly set the trust profile to apply only to certain values > > of > the > > match attribute... not pretty. > > I'm lost...you start by arguing in favor of using Subject, but the > last statement implies to me that you'd prefer a separate element. Really?? The last statement says that if we use a separate element it will make the spec ugly... EHL
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]