[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] subject sets (was: Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-07-16)
Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2009-07-28: > I think for our use cases, all we need is for the URI inside the Subject > elements to match (using 3986 comparison rules). If one side has a set > attribute, the other side must too. The same value also, you mean? That's the literal/syntax match I was referring to, my only question was whether that doesn't rule out the cases that would be easy and have value, like the one I was using as an example. But allowing for that ratchets up the spec work. I agree that syntactic equivalence is simple to specify and immune to extensions breaking it, yes. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]