[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Version Control Commit by blade
We have a registry ready. It is being defined by the IETF and managed by IANA. As for making this a URI or string I don't care much. EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 12:13 PM > To: 'Will Norris'; 'XRI TC' > Subject: RE: [xri] Version Control Commit by blade > > Will Norris wrote on 2009-08-20: > > Now that's really interesting... I hadn't considered "describedby" to > > be a valid value for <Rel>. I'm actually not too fond of that, and > am > > now wondering if we *should* in fact mandate an absolute URI here. > > We should. If you want a URI data type in this kind of field, absolute > is > just assumed (but should be made explicit). Otherwise use string and > get > your registry ready. Do NOT allow for people to just go using strings > themselves. That's a terrible practice and causes no end of problems. > > -- Scott > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]