RE: [xri] <Title>

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote on 2009-09-11:
> If someone needs xml:id they can just use it. I dont want us to
> require it and as an optional feature, it is already possible.

Yes, that's correct, the element is already attribute extensible.

Arguably it doesn't even need to be specified on the root element (and I may
find that it causes an ambiguity, I haven't done the full suite of checks
yet), it's just explicit right now because it's required for signing.

-- Scott