[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] URI Templates syntax
Then the question becomes, what is the right way to do it... I have been thinking about that, mostly in the context of host-meta. It is already extensible by allowing each relation type or protocol to define their own syntax and vocabulary. The only use case we have today for templates is in host-meta (though it was originally requested for OpenSocial but not sure of the status of that at this point). So we can either define a template attribute 'syntax' with a default URI value that means {%} or remove it altogether and not have a default template syntax, in which case host-meta will define it (probably in the same way...). EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 7:24 AM > To: 'Drummond Reed'; Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: 'XRI TC' > Subject: RE: [xri] URI Templates syntax > > Drummond Reed wrote on 2009-09-22: > > Eran, FWIW I agree with you that ideally whatever XRD uses would be > > compatible with whatever IETF is going to standardize. I don't know > how > > long the IETF process is going to take, however, or which way the > wind > > is blowing there. So I'm afraid my only feedback is to go with your > best > > instincts on this. > > Or make it pluggable/extensible. Probably needless to say, I consider > such > pluggability an asset, not a complicating factor. > > -- Scott >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]