Fwd: Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-10-08

[Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>]

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@cordance.net>
> Date: October 8, 2009 3:15:33 PM PDT
> To: XRI TC <xri@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Cc: Peter C Davis <peter.davis@neustar.biz>, Will Norris <will@willnorris.com 
> >, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
> Subject: Minutes: XRI TC Telecon 2-3PM PT Thursday 2009-10-08
>
> Following are the minutes of the unofficial telecon of the XRI TC at:
>
> Date:  Thursday, 08 October 2009 USA
> Time:  2:00PM - 3:00PM Pacific Time (21:00-22:00 UTC)
>
> ATTENDING
>
> Will Norris
> John Bradley
> Markus Sabadello
> Drummond Reed
> Tatsuki Sakushima
>
>
> AGENDA
>
> 1) XRD 1.0 WD06 ISSUES
>
> The main focus of the telecon was review of final issues with WD06.
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34072/xrd-1.0-wd06.html
>
> The following issues were discussed and decided:
>
> 1A) If we are agreed on 0-or-1 cardinality for Rel, URI, and MediaType
> within a Link, has a decision been made about these being attributes  
> vs.
> elements?
>
>
> Drummond noted that Scott couldn't make the call as he's on a plane,  
> but he
> sent a message confirming that XSD Choice is only available for  
> elements,
> not attributes. Breno also could not attend but sent an email  
> suggesting one
> way to get around that by using Link and Link-Template elements.
>
>
> #DECISION: Those present on the call discussed it at some length and  
> came to
> the conclusion that because XSD only allows a choice between  
> elements, the
> design will be cleaner if we keep them all as elements. Secondly, this
> appraoch supports Subject being an element at both the XRD and the  
> Link
> level (having it as an element at the XRD level and attribute at the  
> Link
> level seemed ugly).
>
>
> 1B) Should we keep the element names URI and URITemplate?
>
>
>
> #DECISION: Yes, we want to keep the distinction clear.
>
>
> 1C) Did the host-meta subject URI issue get settled? What was the  
> outcome?
>
>
> Yes. Will said that he believes that host-meta XRDs will have a custom
> <Host> element defined in the host-meta namespace, and that this is  
> still
> the current concensus. If so, this issue is closed from an XRD 1.0
> perspective.
>
>
> 1D) Linked XRDs - what was the final outcome?
>
>
> #DECISION: We discussed it and believe our decision was that for XRD  
> 1.0,
> XRD linking/delegation would be defined only in the host-meta spec,  
> since
> this is the only compelling use case. So this issue is closed for  
> XRD 1.0.
>
>
>
> 2) SCHEDULE FOR COMMITTEE DRAFT 01 VOTE
>
> We discussed the steps and timeline necesary:
>
> a) Will will make the changes and run by Scott.
>
> b) Will will update the Processing Rules section to now deal only with
> "atomic" Link elements, and also reflect any other changes that come  
> out of
> that.
>
> c) Will will talk to Eran to see if he has any other final changes.  
> As soon
> as they are ready, they will push out WD07.
>
> d) At that point, it is truly "Last Call". Any feedback on WD07 MUST  
> be sent
> back to Will and Eran by early next week so that, if needed, a final  
> WD08
> can be produced BEFORE next week's call.
>
> THE GOAL IS TO REACH CONCENSUS ON HOLDING A COMMITTEE DRAFT VOTE (on  
> either
> WD07 or if necessary WD08) ON NEXT WEEK'S CALL.
>
> That way the CD vote (and the Public Review vote) can be opened on  
> Friday,
> Oct. 16 and run through Friday, Oct. 23. It closes in time to leave  
> a week
> for OASIS to prepare it for public review, which would then start in  
> time
> for Internet Identity Workshop (Nov 3-5 in Mountain View, CA).
>
>
> 3) OTHER LINK HEADER/HOST META/LRDD STATUS/ISSUES
>
>       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header
>       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-site-meta
>       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-discovery
>
> Eran was not able to join the call, but Will will check with him to  
> see if
> there are any related issues that would impact the XRD 1.0 CD vote.
>
>
> 4) XRI SYNTAX 3.0 WORKING DRAFT 03 STATUS/ISSUES
>
> Drummond has been concentrating on XRD 1.0 closure but will be  
> working on
> XRI Syntax 3.0 WD03 during his next two weeks in Europe. His goal is  
> to
> publish WD03 as the first complete before IIW.
>
>
> 5) NEXT CALL
>
> The next call will be at the regular time next week. THIS IS A VERY
> IMPORTANT CALL SINCE WE NEED TO REACH CONSENSUS ON HOLDING THE CD  
> VOTE ON
> XRD 1.0. Please plan ahead to attend if you possibly can. (Note that
> Drummond will be speaking at a conference in Norway, so he may have an
> unreconciliable conflict, however he will be contacting Peter to  
> make sure
> he chair the call.)