Re: [xri] Re: Comment signing (was RE: [xri] CANCELLED: XRI TC Telecon Thursday 12/03)

[Will Norris <will@willnorris.com>]

+1.  just send me the changes.

-will

On Dec 3, 2009, at 10:48 AM, Drummond Reed wrote:

> Scott, thanks for pointing that out. I don't have a strong feeling, but if
> its perceived of as a benefit to be able to sign the comments, and the fix
> is small, it would probably be good to add it to CD02.
> 
> How do others feel?
> 
> =Drummond
> 
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:38 AM, Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Drummond Reed wrote on 2009-12-03:
>>> A quick poll determined we don't have any pressing agenda items this
>> week,
>>> so we will not hold a call tomorrow. Note that next Thursday John Bradley
>>> and I will be at an iTrust conference at NIH in Washington D.C., so we
>> won't
>>> be able to attend. I'll leave it to Peter, Will, and Eran to organize a
>> call
>>> if needed.
>> 
>> I'm not in a hurry to bring it up, given the timing cycle, but I did want
>> to
>> note at some point that it turns out the Signature profile adopted by XRI
>> (from SAML) happens to have a weird property that I wasn't aware of in that
>> it precludes signing of comments.
>> 
>> If that's a concern, or somebody has a use case for that, I can provide an
>> adjusted version that fixes that.
>> 
>> -- Scott
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>