[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [xri] Re: Comment signing (was RE: [xri] CANCELLED: XRI TC Telecon Thursday 12/03)
Will Norris wrote on 2009-12-12: > oops, also meant to clarify this last point. My XPath is rusty, but you're > saying that an XPath query containing only a single element ID reference > excludes comment nodes? No. That syntax isn't an XPath query, it's a same-document URI reference. (This is 1.1, but it's the same text as the original spec.) http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-xmldsig-core1-20090730/#sec-Same-Document > I couldn't find anything to that effect in the > XPath spec, but that doesn't mean much. I'm just curious why this syntax > automatically drops comment nodes. Basically because c14n over a node set doesn't strip comments automatically, so using a "no comments" c14n algorithm would end up including comments. It's a bug in the specs that they hacked around in a rather dumb way. -- Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]