Re: [xri] Comparison Rules

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Scott Cantor <cantor.2@osu.edu> wrote:

Will Norris wrote on 2010-02-18:

> any thoughts on this last issues regarding media type (item 'c' in
> Drummond's list)? This is the only outstanding issue I have for this
> set of changes.

As I recall the conversation, 2616 was the only likely place to reference
for any rules on comparisons. I wasn't sure what your suggestion was, or
whether you were identifying an issue with using it.

I was mainly looking for any feedback regarding the question:

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Will Norris <willnorris@google.com> wrote:

Should we be referencing 2616 instead of 2046, for the initial definition of 'type' in XRD? That might actually make a lot of sense, since 2046 doesn't actually define the syntax of a media type... that's in 2045 (as well as 2616, of course).

xri message