[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Candidate agenda items
At 30 Sep 2000 14:41 -0700, G. Ken Holman wrote: > Some of my input to Wednesday's meeting: > > At 00/09/29 15:41 -0400, David_Marston@lotus.com wrote: ... > >3. How do we want to measure conformance to errata? > > Would we not consider any erratum to be as weighty as the original document? Yes, but what do you do about errata published after a particular XSLT processor is released? How can a processor not conform if it conforms to the standard+errata at the time the processor was released, but how can it conform if there's new errata published after the processor's release date that changed the expected behaviour of "conformant" XSLT processors? Regards, Tony Graham ====================================================================== Tony Graham mailto:tgraham@mulberrytech.com Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com 17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9632 Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631 Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML ======================================================================
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC