[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Tin Man Design Question 9 - to vote Jan. 9th?
Here is one of the issues identified in my message titled "Test Case Markup & Cataloging, Tin Man edition" that I sent to this list on 12/1/2000: 9. Do we want to collapse standard output and standard error together? DISCUSSION: The spec doesn't seem to recognize where "console output" goes. The "compare" attribute of the Scenario element can be simpler if we don't recognize standard output and standard error as distinct. Those representing the test-lab interests should speak up if you think there is a need to keep the two separate. If separate, the output comparison for messages would insist on getting the required message through the specified channel. This design assumes that we can devise a reasonable way to deal with messages. I think that we can get at least part of the way to reasonable. I can expound on that idea at the meeting, if you wish. Ultimately, this would be a "lump or separate" vote. .................David Marston
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC