[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: draft Submission Manual
>> = draft Submission Manual >> [...] = Cris > = David > -----Original Message----- > From: David_Marston@lotus.com [mailto:David_Marston@lotus.com] > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 11:43 AM > To: xslt-conformance@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: draft Submission Manual > > > Stan is assigned to write the Submission Procedure, so he should take > the draft Submission Manual and add to it. It needs steps like: > 1. Put all test (input) files in a "clean" directory tree and ZIP up. > 2. Put reference output files in a "clean" directory tree and ZIP up. > 3. Make a catalog in XML per the guidelines in [filenames here]. > 4. Validate your catalog using valcat. > 5. Mail them somewhere. Excellent! I'm glad Stan is taking on that important task. Lack of specific instructions to Submitters has been a flaw to date. And the examples you give are just the sort of instruction needed. > > I'll deal with a couple questions here. > > >2. The Committee will create a directory tree of test cases, based on > >the Submitter's ID where the first level down the tree separates out > >the tests by Submitter. [Is this still accurate?] > > Better to say: > 2. The Committee will create a directory tree of test cases, where the > first level down the tree separates out the > tests by Submitter. > Okay. > >3....Correct output files and parameter-setting files will be > >located in specified directories of the mirrored file hierarchy. > >[Can we be more specific?] > > The parameter-setting part is still unclear. For the other files: > "The submitter should supply a reference output for each test, in the > form of a file serialized as XML, HTML, or text, according to the > test. For tests of xsl:message, the generated message byte-stream > should be provided in a separate file, shorn of all verbiage before > or after the actual message. These files should be named and placed > in a directory tree to correlate directly with the test inputs. The > Committee will assemble a consolidated tree of all reference outputs, > then create another tree that contains XML/UTF-8 representations of > the InfoSet of each file." Okay. > > >7. In cases where the Submitter is resubmitting new tests along with > >tests that are unchanged since the previous submission, the Reviewers > >will filter out the new tests from the old. [Is this correct? How > >will Reviewers do this?] > > I think this should be dealt with in a section entitled "How to > Update Your Submission" that says new tests should have non-conflicting > names, while changed tests should have a newer date (in per-case data > in the catalog of test cases) than the previous submission. We will > accept updates that contain a whole suite as long as we can readily > determine which tests actually changed from the prior submission. Okay, I'll create the new section. The question about Reviewers is still open and should be addressed. > .................David Marston > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC