OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
ciq
63 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Germany and OASIS and X-Meld - addresses and XML
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 30 Oct 2004 21:43:21 -0000
RE: [ciq] Extending xCIL
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 29 Oct 2004 01:38:59 -0000
Extending xCIL
From
colin.wallis@ssc.govt.nz on 29 Oct 2004 01:30:35 -0000
Voting results regarding xsd:any element and attribute
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 29 Oct 2004 00:28:02 -0000
Re: [ciq] CAM and CIQ
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 28 Oct 2004 12:26:11 -0000
FW: OASIS Project of agreement
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 28 Oct 2004 05:48:50 -0000
RE: [ciq] CAM and CIQ
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 28 Oct 2004 00:33:53 -0000
FW: Groups - oasis - Ballot "CIQ V3.0 features" has closed
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 28 Oct 2004 00:03:47 -0000
Re: [ciq] CAM and CIQ
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 26 Oct 2004 14:30:50 -0000
CAM and CIQ
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 26 Oct 2004 04:30:26 -0000
RE: UBL and Tim McGrath
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 26 Oct 2004 04:27:56 -0000
FW: [cam] Re: [wsbpel] 20040902 schema comments / RNC version
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 24 Oct 2004 22:49:36 -0000
Re: [egov] Central Address Database
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 20 Oct 2004 12:48:36 -0000
FW: [egov] Re: Central Address Database
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 20 Oct 2004 07:51:58 -0000
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 20 Oct 2004 06:00:29 -0000
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
Max Voskob <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz> on 19 Oct 2004 20:12:05 -0000
Re: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 19 Oct 2004 13:53:50 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Tue Oct 19 07:58:09 2004
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
"Mark Meadows" <mmeadows@microsoft.com> on 19 Oct 2004 11:39:18 -0000
[no subject]
From
Unknown on Mon Oct 18 23:58:11 2004
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz on 19 Oct 2004 03:49:41 -0000
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz on 19 Oct 2004 03:33:56 -0000
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
Max Voskob <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz> on 19 Oct 2004 03:23:30 -0000
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
"Hido Hasimbegovic" <hido.hasimbegovic@customware.net> on 19 Oct 2004 03:07:27 -0000
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 19 Oct 2004 03:01:04 -0000
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 19 Oct 2004 02:52:15 -0000
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
Max Voskob <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz> on 19 Oct 2004 02:46:08 -0000
RE: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
"Hido Hasimbegovic" <hido.hasimbegovic@customware.net> on 18 Oct 2004 23:28:23 -0000
Re: [ciq] CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 18 Oct 2004 13:15:09 -0000
CIQ using UBL NDR?
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 18 Oct 2004 07:14:29 -0000
Re: [ciq] FW: UBL Address format vs. CIQ
From
Michael.Roytman@vertexinc.com on 15 Oct 2004 13:21:13 -0000
Re: [ciq] FW: UBL Address format vs. CIQ
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 15 Oct 2004 13:09:25 -0000
Re: [ciq] FW: UBL Address format vs. CIQ
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 15 Oct 2004 12:51:05 -0000
Re: [ciq] FW: UBL Address format vs. CIQ
From
Michael.Roytman@vertexinc.com on 15 Oct 2004 11:40:50 -0000
using jCAM to apply semantics to CIQ nouns
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 15 Oct 2004 01:29:21 -0000
Re: [ciq] FW: UBL Address format vs. CIQ
From
"David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info> on 15 Oct 2004 00:38:05 -0000
RE: [ciq] FW: UBL Address format vs. CIQ
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 14 Oct 2004 22:01:49 -0000
Re: [ciq] FW: UBL Address format vs. CIQ
From
Michael.Roytman@vertexinc.com on 14 Oct 2004 12:56:40 -0000
FW: UBL Address format vs. CIQ
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 13 Oct 2004 00:46:59 -0000
RE: OASIS RE : Global and application independent "Name and Address XML Specification" from OASIS
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 12 Oct 2004 22:31:17 -0000
RE: [ciq] Address structures not defined by UPU - Part II
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 12 Oct 2004 01:13:16 -0000
RE: [ciq] Address structures not defined by UPU - Part II
From
"Hido Hasimbegovic" <hido.hasimbegovic@customware.net> on 12 Oct 2004 00:44:44 -0000
Address structures not defined by UPU - Part II
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 12 Oct 2004 00:25:08 -0000
Re: [ciq] RE: OASIS RE : Global and application independent "Nameand Address XML Specification" from OASIS
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 12 Oct 2004 00:19:39 -0000
RE: OASIS RE : Global and application independent "Name and Address XML Specification" from OASIS
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 11 Oct 2004 21:44:12 -0000
Miissing address structure explanation by UPU - Addresses (FILE 1 of 2)
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 11 Oct 2004 06:15:11 -0000
RE: [ciq] Max, does the following Russian address explanation from UPUmake sense?
From
Max Voskob <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz> on 11 Oct 2004 02:43:40 -0000
Max, does the following Russian address explanation from UPU make sense?
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 11 Oct 2004 00:12:48 -0000
Another example from UPU that is not defined
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 11 Oct 2004 00:08:49 -0000
RE: [ciq] FW: Global and application independent"Name and Address XML Specification" from OASIS
From
Max Voskob <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz> on 10 Oct 2004 23:39:23 -0000
RE: [ciq] FW: Global and application independent "Name and Address XML Specification" from OASIS
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 10 Oct 2004 23:08:59 -0000
Re: [ciq] FW: Global and application independent "Name and Address XML Specification" from OASIS
From
"Joe Lubenow" <lubenow@msn.com> on 10 Oct 2004 23:03:03 -0000
FW: Global and application independent "Name and Address XML Specification" from OASIS
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 10 Oct 2004 22:40:05 -0000
FW: Global and application independent "Name and Address XML Specification" from OASIS
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 8 Oct 2004 02:51:15 -0000
FW: [chairs] Updated Naming Guidelines for review and discussion
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 7 Oct 2004 22:11:48 -0000
Re: [ciq] UBL 1.0 address handling problem
From
David RR Webber <david@drrw.info> on 7 Oct 2004 12:52:00 -0000
RE: [ciq] Latest versions of xNL and xAL (Version 3.0.5)
From
Max Voskob <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz> on 7 Oct 2004 07:25:53 -0000
RE: [ciq] UBL 1.0 address handling problem
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 7 Oct 2004 06:37:36 -0000
RE: [ciq] Latest versions of xNL and xAL (Version 3.0.5)
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 7 Oct 2004 04:24:13 -0000
RE: [ciq] Latest versions of xNL and xAL (Version 3.0.5)
From
"Hido Hasimbegovic" <hido.hasimbegovic@customware.net> on 7 Oct 2004 04:22:50 -0000
RE: [ciq] Latest versions of xNL and xAL (Version 3.0.5)
From
"Hido Hasimbegovic" <hido.hasimbegovic@customware.net> on 7 Oct 2004 04:16:52 -0000
Latest versions of xNL and xAL (Version 3.0.5)
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 7 Oct 2004 02:56:09 -0000
UBL 1.0 address handling problem
From
"Ram Kumar" <RKumar@msi.com.au> on 6 Oct 2004 07:28:45 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2