OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
legalxml-econtracts
104 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Match ALL words
Match ANY word
McClure Proposal and Web Site
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 28 Apr 2003 18:58:59 -0000
eContracts Architecture
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 28 Apr 2003 18:43:49 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
"jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> on 26 Apr 2003 15:41:15 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
"Peter Meyer" <pmeyer@elkera.com.au> on 26 Apr 2003 13:33:25 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
"jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> on 26 Apr 2003 12:39:15 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
"Peter Meyer" <pmeyer@elkera.com.au> on 26 Apr 2003 04:30:10 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 26 Apr 2003 01:39:02 -0000
Prospective Member Welcome and Suggested Debate Convention
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@MIT.EDU> on 26 Apr 2003 00:11:45 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
"Matthew MacKenzie" <matt@yellowdragonsoft.com> on 25 Apr 2003 23:43:19 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
"Peter Meyer" <pmeyer@elkera.com.au> on 25 Apr 2003 23:30:03 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 25 Apr 2003 16:19:56 -0000
FW: transforms, XMLDSIG, and presentation(was [dss] Requesr for comments: Proposal of message for XMLDSIG)
From
"jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> on 24 Apr 2003 15:32:38 -0000
Draft - Second half of 4/23 minutes
From
Dave Marvit <dave@marvit.org> on 24 Apr 2003 04:46:34 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
"Peter Meyer" <pmeyer@elkera.com.au> on 24 Apr 2003 03:26:39 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] The Future We Want?
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 24 Apr 2003 03:18:35 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] CSS - "hanging indent" attempts
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 24 Apr 2003 02:55:21 -0000
Requirements process
From
"Peter Meyer" <pmeyer@elkera.com.au> on 24 Apr 2003 02:43:30 -0000
The Future We Want?
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 23 Apr 2003 23:52:58 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] CSS - "hanging indent" attempts
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 23 Apr 2003 23:33:44 -0000
Interoperability testing
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 23 Apr 2003 19:22:18 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Display/Presentation Agenda Item: Proposed Wording Second Draft
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 23 Apr 2003 19:18:12 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Display/Presentation Agenda Item: Proposed Wording Second Draft
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 23 Apr 2003 19:15:10 -0000
Contract Headings/Captions: Legal Implication of Technical Solution
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 23 Apr 2003 19:05:52 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Display/Presentation Agenda Item: Proposed Wording Second Draft
From
"Eddie O'Brien" <eddie@ringtailsolutions.com> on 23 Apr 2003 19:03:02 -0000
Display/Presentation Agenda Item: Proposed Wording Second Draft
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 23 Apr 2003 18:25:43 -0000
Call In Number & Revised Agenda: eContracts Technical Committee
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 23 Apr 2003 17:39:36 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] CSS - "hanging indent" attempts
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 23 Apr 2003 16:52:36 -0000
CSS - "hanging indent" attempts
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 23 Apr 2003 10:42:31 -0000
Clause Models - Jason and John's
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 23 Apr 2003 00:40:31 -0000
CSS2 - A Rod for our Backs
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 23 Apr 2003 00:36:44 -0000
[legalxml-econtracts] Legal Markup
From
"Sergio Maldonado Elvira" <sergio@smaldonado.com> on 22 Apr 2003 22:02:35 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] FWD: RE: [members] OASIS TC Call For Participation: Electronic Procurement
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 22 Apr 2003 19:39:50 -0000
FWD: RE: [members] OASIS TC Call For Participation: Electronic Procurement
From
"jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> on 22 Apr 2003 18:45:55 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Agenda; Call In Number?
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 22 Apr 2003 17:38:57 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Clause Structure applied to Benchmark Contract
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 22 Apr 2003 17:31:58 -0000
Agenda; Call In Number?
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 22 Apr 2003 13:29:51 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Clause Structure applied to Benchmark Contract
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 22 Apr 2003 09:02:40 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Clause Structure applied to Benchmark Contract
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 22 Apr 2003 03:01:15 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Clause Structure applied to Benchmark Contract
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 22 Apr 2003 00:23:51 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Clause Structure applied to Benchmark Contract
From
"Eddie O'Brien" <eddie@ringtailsolutions.com> on 21 Apr 2003 18:33:56 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Clause Structure applied to Benchmark Contract
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 21 Apr 2003 16:49:18 -0000
Clause Structure applied to Benchmark Contract
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 21 Apr 2003 15:58:06 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Official XML Records
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 21 Apr 2003 06:14:05 -0000
Contract Code: Manifestation, Machines and the Mind.
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 21 Apr 2003 05:52:31 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> on 21 Apr 2003 04:10:49 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Official XML Records
From
"Chambers, Rolly" <rlchambers@smithcurrie.com> on 21 Apr 2003 00:24:56 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"Chambers, Rolly" <rlchambers@smithcurrie.com> on 20 Apr 2003 23:56:23 -0000
Official XML Records
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 20 Apr 2003 23:49:50 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> on 20 Apr 2003 22:13:18 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"Chambers, Rolly" <rlchambers@smithcurrie.com> on 20 Apr 2003 21:53:09 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 20 Apr 2003 12:48:55 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 20 Apr 2003 12:48:27 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"Sergio Maldonado Elvira" <sergio@smaldonado.com> on 20 Apr 2003 00:29:33 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 19 Apr 2003 22:12:34 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 19 Apr 2003 18:58:22 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"Eddie O'Brien" <eddie@ringtailsolutions.com> on 19 Apr 2003 17:36:51 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"Eddie O'Brien" <eddie@ringtailsolutions.com> on 19 Apr 2003 12:25:20 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 19 Apr 2003 06:04:47 -0000
Atoms vs Bits: the Role of CSS and Other Presentation Methods
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 18 Apr 2003 07:46:48 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 18 Apr 2003 07:06:19 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Face2Face Meetings
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 18 Apr 2003 03:54:34 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Face2Face Meetings
From
Karl Best <karl.best@oasis-open.org> on 18 Apr 2003 03:51:01 -0000
The CSS issue (was .. Req #106)
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 18 Apr 2003 00:37:20 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Compromise Contract Structure,
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 17 Apr 2003 23:21:36 -0000
Compromise Contract Structure, and Req #106
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 17 Apr 2003 21:02:24 -0000
Scenario - Law Firm Contract Creation and Negotiation - draft 4
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 17 Apr 2003 15:59:29 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Automated Negotiation and Contract Markup
From
"jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> on 16 Apr 2003 23:44:31 -0000
Automated Negotiation and Contract Markup
From
Dave Marvit <dave@marvit.org> on 16 Apr 2003 23:24:59 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Face2Face Meetings
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@MIT.EDU> on 16 Apr 2003 17:01:44 -0000
Benchmark Contracts . . . Of Course!
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@MIT.EDU> on 16 Apr 2003 16:54:14 -0000
Face2Face Meetings
From
Barry Hansen <bhansen@imany.com> on 16 Apr 2003 15:41:19 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] RE: Proposal: One container per level in the clause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
"Rolly Chambers" <rlchambers@smithcurrie.com> on 16 Apr 2003 15:18:58 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] RE: Proposal: One container per level in theclause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
jkeane <jik@jkeane.com> on 16 Apr 2003 14:14:53 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] RE: Proposal: One container per level inthe clause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 16 Apr 2003 05:15:57 -0000
No Subject
From
Anonymous on Tue Apr 15 23:58:10 2003
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] RE: Proposal: One container per level in the clause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 16 Apr 2003 03:11:39 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] RE: Proposal: One container per level inthe clause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 16 Apr 2003 02:01:08 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] RE: Proposal: One container per level inthe clause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 16 Apr 2003 01:38:04 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] RE: Proposal: One container per level in the clause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 15 Apr 2003 20:17:54 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] RE: Proposal: One container per level in the clause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 15 Apr 2003 18:49:01 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] RE: Proposal: One container per level in theclause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
jkeane <jik@jkeane.com> on 15 Apr 2003 18:08:08 -0000
RE: Proposal: One container per level in the clause hierarchy (was Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 15 Apr 2003 17:10:49 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Proposal: One container per level in the clause hierarchy (was Re:[legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
"jmessing" <jmessing@law-on-line.com> on 15 Apr 2003 04:42:17 -0000
Proposal: One container per level in the clause hierarchy (was Re:[legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers)
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 15 Apr 2003 03:20:31 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 15 Apr 2003 00:31:24 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Autonumbering - a non-issue
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 13 Apr 2003 22:55:14 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] Caption Numbers
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 13 Apr 2003 22:48:36 -0000
Autonumbering - a non-issue
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 13 Apr 2003 19:25:38 -0000
Caption Numbers
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 13 Apr 2003 18:15:30 -0000
RE: [Fwd: [legalxml-econtracts] Variable Structure]
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 13 Apr 2003 17:05:28 -0000
Re: [Fwd: [legalxml-econtracts] Variable Structure]
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 13 Apr 2003 12:22:09 -0000
Clause Model - draft FAQs for discussion
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 13 Apr 2003 12:02:17 -0000
Variable Structure
From
"John McClure" <jmcclure@hypergrove.com> on 11 Apr 2003 17:26:35 -0000
Draft Minutes for End of Meeting Today
From
"Daniel Greenwood" <dang@mit.edu> on 9 Apr 2003 22:42:29 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] hierarchical clause model?
From
"Chambers, Rolly" <rlchambers@smithcurrie.com> on 8 Apr 2003 12:34:10 -0000
RE: [legalxml-econtracts] hierarchical clause model?
From
"Dave Marvit" <dave@marvit.org> on 8 Apr 2003 03:43:37 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] hierarchical clause model?
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 8 Apr 2003 01:09:20 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] hierarchical clause model?
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 8 Apr 2003 01:08:49 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] hierarchical clause model?
From
Dave Marvit <dave@marvit.org> on 7 Apr 2003 19:41:09 -0000
Re: [legalxml-econtracts] hierarchical clause model?
From
"Rolly Chambers" <rlchambers@smithcurrie.com> on 7 Apr 2003 18:27:46 -0000
hierarchical clause model?
From
Jason Harrop <jharrop@speedlegal.com> on 7 Apr 2003 14:47:51 -0000
Agenda for upcoming meeting from the OASIS Legal XML Member Section Electronic Contracts Technical Committee Secretary (File id: @@2137)
From
"Dr. Laurence Leff" <D-Leff@wiu.edu> on 7 Apr 2003 03:01:44 -0000
Minutes Draft from the OASIS Legal XML Member Section Electronic Contracts Technical Committee Secretary
From
"Dr. Laurence Leff" <D-Leff@wiu.edu> on 7 Apr 2003 02:56:14 -0000
Official Communication from the OASIS Legal XML Member Section Electronic Contracts Technical Committee Secretary
From
"Dr. Laurence Leff" <D-Leff@wiu.edu> on 7 Apr 2003 02:54:13 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.4.5