OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
office
262 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
Re: [office] Another view on conformance?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 28 Feb 2009 21:31:08 -0000
Re: [office] Another view on conformance?
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 28 Feb 2009 17:00:58 -0000
Re: [office] Another view on conformance?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 28 Feb 2009 16:14:22 -0000
Re: [office] Another view on conformance?
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 28 Feb 2009 15:35:06 -0000
Re: [office] Another view on conformance?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 28 Feb 2009 15:25:48 -0000
Another view on conformance?
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 28 Feb 2009 07:59:27 -0000
RE: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 27 Feb 2009 21:18:00 -0000
RE: [office] A question about text:span and styles
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 27 Feb 2009 21:17:55 -0000
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Stephen Peront <stepper@microsoft.com> on 27 Feb 2009 19:12:06 -0000
Re: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Warren Turkal <turkal@google.com> on 27 Feb 2009 16:47:07 -0000
Re: [office] A question about text:span and styles
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 27 Feb 2009 14:27:08 -0000
A question about text:span and styles
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 27 Feb 2009 13:49:12 -0000
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 27 Feb 2009 10:45:31 -0000
RE: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com> on 27 Feb 2009 02:56:51 -0000
Re: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2009 23:34:42 -0000
RE: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Stephen Peront <stepper@microsoft.com> on 26 Feb 2009 22:10:09 -0000
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2009 19:24:54 -0000
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2009 19:24:53 -0000
Res: RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
"Jomar Silva" <jomar.silva@br.odfalliance.org> on 26 Feb 2009 18:42:36 -0000
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 26 Feb 2009 18:28:12 -0000
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com> on 26 Feb 2009 18:13:48 -0000
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2009 17:56:55 -0000
RE: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com> on 26 Feb 2009 17:34:57 -0000
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Jomar Silva <jomar.silva@br.odfalliance.org> on 26 Feb 2009 17:10:54 -0000
Re: [office] Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 26 Feb 2009 17:00:32 -0000
[office] OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda March 2nd, 2008
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 26 Feb 2009 16:04:12 -0000
Our Position on the Conformance Proposal
From
Stephen Peront <stepper@microsoft.com> on 26 Feb 2009 15:46:35 -0000
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 25 Feb 2009 21:42:32 -0000
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 25 Feb 2009 21:23:56 -0000
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 --Schemas?
From
Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com> on 25 Feb 2009 20:52:35 -0000
RE: [office] TC meeting times during Daylight Savings Timetransition
From
Stephen Peront <stepper@microsoft.com> on 24 Feb 2009 22:39:36 -0000
Res: [office] TC meeting times during Daylight Savings Time transition
From
"Jomar Silva" <jomar.silva@br.odfalliance.org> on 24 Feb 2009 22:38:37 -0000
Res: [office] TC meeting times during Daylight Savings Time transition
From
"Jomar Silva" <jomar.silva@br.odfalliance.org> on 24 Feb 2009 22:38:37 -0000
TC meeting times during Daylight Savings Time transition
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 24 Feb 2009 22:19:04 -0000
OpenDocument TC meeting minutes 2009-02-23
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Feb 2009 20:39:44 -0000
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 23 Feb 2009 18:11:16 -0000
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 23 Feb 2009 17:49:01 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Feb 2009 15:44:12 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2009 15:34:57 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 23 Feb 2009 14:27:30 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Feb 2009 14:11:53 -0000
Conformance Clauses: Building consensus around ODF 1.2
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 23 Feb 2009 13:40:00 -0000
Re: [office-comment] Whitespace again (ODF all version)
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 23 Feb 2009 13:17:35 -0000
Re: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 23 Feb 2009 08:21:35 -0000
Re: [office] RELAX NG and xml:id
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 23 Feb 2009 08:18:18 -0000
RE: [office] Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 -- Schemas?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 23 Feb 2009 02:43:19 -0000
RE: [office] RELAX NG and xml:id
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 23 Feb 2009 02:43:19 -0000
Re: [office] RELAX NG and xml:id
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 22 Feb 2009 21:48:06 -0000
RELAX NG and xml:id
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 22 Feb 2009 20:31:07 -0000
Re: [office] RE: [office-comment] ODF security hazard? (ODF allversions)
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 22 Feb 2009 03:37:05 -0000
RE: [office] RE: [office-comment] ODF security hazard? (ODF all versions)
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 22 Feb 2009 02:01:20 -0000
RE: [office-comment] ODF security hazard? (ODF all versions)
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 21 Feb 2009 23:24:29 -0000
ODF-Next Call for Proposals
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 21 Feb 2009 00:54:01 -0000
Unanimous Consent
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2009 20:42:50 -0000
ISO/IEC 26300 maintenance protocols
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2009 16:31:19 -0000
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 References
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 20 Feb 2009 01:17:12 -0000
ODF 1.2 References
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2009 01:04:35 -0000
Groups - references.odt uploaded
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Feb 2009 00:01:56 -0000
OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda February 23rd, 2008
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Feb 2009 20:20:56 -0000
[office] OpenDocument TC coordination call draft minutes 2009-02-16
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 19 Feb 2009 10:32:31 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 18 Feb 2009 19:46:33 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2009 17:36:14 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 18 Feb 2009 17:00:23 -0000
minutes for Feb 16 meeting?
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 18 Feb 2009 16:07:38 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 18 Feb 2009 14:55:17 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 18 Feb 2009 11:06:48 -0000
Color/Intensity issue
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 17 Feb 2009 17:44:41 -0000
RE: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 17 Feb 2009 16:39:41 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01 (OpenDocument-v1.2-committeeDraft-01.odt) uploaded
From
patrick@durusau.net on 17 Feb 2009 15:05:19 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 17 Feb 2009 14:18:29 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2009 21:52:19 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2009 17:17:31 -0000
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 16 Feb 2009 15:53:32 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 16 Feb 2009 15:47:30 -0000
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2009 14:49:42 -0000
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
Thorsten Zachmann <t.zachmann@zagge.de> on 16 Feb 2009 14:44:05 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Feb 2009 06:09:51 -0000
RE: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 15 Feb 2009 22:48:53 -0000
Groups - ODF Register of Public Comments (CommentsRegistry.ods) (formerly 07-11-24-spec00025) modified
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 15 Feb 2009 21:57:31 -0000
Groups - ODF Register of Public Comments (07-11-24-spec00025) uploaded
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 15 Feb 2009 21:56:05 -0000
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 15 Feb 2009 13:00:19 -0000
Re: [office] Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
Thorsten Zachmann <t.zachmann@zagge.de> on 15 Feb 2009 12:21:28 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power and Legacy Obligations
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 14 Feb 2009 08:17:25 -0000
RE: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Jomar Silva <jomar.silva@br.odfalliance.org> on 13 Feb 2009 21:49:55 -0000
RE: [office] The Rule of Least Power and Legacy Obligations
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 13 Feb 2009 19:56:02 -0000
Re: [office] RDF metadata as an extension mechanism
From
Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 13 Feb 2009 16:12:54 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Feb 2009 16:06:50 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Feb 2009 15:57:53 -0000
RDF metadata as an extension mechanism
From
Michael Stahl <Michael.Stahl@Sun.COM> on 13 Feb 2009 15:18:32 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Feb 2009 15:11:49 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 13 Feb 2009 15:07:36 -0000
Re: [office] Re: Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
"Andreas J. Guelzow" <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 13 Feb 2009 14:52:17 -0000
Re: [office] Re: Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 13 Feb 2009 10:06:58 -0000
Re: [office] Re: Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 13 Feb 2009 08:17:01 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 22:32:38 -0000
Re: [office] Part 2?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 22:32:36 -0000
Part 2?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 12 Feb 2009 21:27:36 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 12 Feb 2009 19:12:15 -0000
Re: Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 12 Feb 2009 17:12:46 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 16:59:32 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 16:37:52 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 16:37:46 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 12 Feb 2009 16:32:04 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 12 Feb 2009 16:12:45 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 16:00:56 -0000
[office] OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda February 16th, 2009
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 12 Feb 2009 15:30:57 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 12 Feb 2009 15:20:23 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 12 Feb 2009 14:58:34 -0000
Foreign attributes in <*-properties> elements
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 12 Feb 2009 14:47:46 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 12 Feb 2009 14:24:51 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument-schema-v1.2-draft9.zip uploaded
From
michael.brauer@sun.com on 12 Feb 2009 14:17:49 -0000
OpenDocument v1.2 Draft 9
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 12 Feb 2009 13:48:25 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-draft9.odt uploaded
From
michael.brauer@sun.com on 12 Feb 2009 13:40:10 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 13:30:21 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 13:22:28 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 12 Feb 2009 12:24:06 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 12 Feb 2009 11:51:53 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 11:04:46 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Feb 2009 10:48:06 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 12 Feb 2009 10:20:34 -0000
Re: [office] The Rule of Least Power
From
Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 11 Feb 2009 22:09:33 -0000
RE: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Feb 2009 20:37:16 -0000
The Rule of Least Power
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Feb 2009 20:37:15 -0000
Groups - OpenDocument-v1.2-draft8j.odt (OpenDocument-v1.2-draft8j.odt) uploaded
From
patrick@durusau.net on 11 Feb 2009 18:08:18 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause Proposal: Clarifications,Extension features
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 11 Feb 2009 08:16:23 -0000
Struggling 150 years for Standards
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 10 Feb 2009 20:54:41 -0000
OpenDocument conformance definition proposal v9
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 10 Feb 2009 15:57:38 -0000
Groups - Conformance Definition Proposal (conformance-definition-proposal-v9.odt) (formerly 08-09-26-proposal00074) modified
From
michael.brauer@sun.com on 10 Feb 2009 15:49:24 -0000
Groups - Conformance Definition Proposal (08-09-26-proposal00074) uploaded
From
michael.brauer@sun.com on 10 Feb 2009 15:48:33 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 10 Feb 2009 09:46:05 -0000
RE: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2009 20:33:56 -0000
RE: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com> on 9 Feb 2009 19:32:17 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 9 Feb 2009 19:15:27 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 9 Feb 2009 18:56:32 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 9 Feb 2009 18:24:52 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause Proposal: Clarifications, Extension features
From
Thomas Zander <T.Zander@nokia.com> on 9 Feb 2009 17:24:20 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2009 17:01:08 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2009 17:01:05 -0000
OpenDocument TC meeting minutes 2009-02-09
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 9 Feb 2009 16:53:00 -0000
Re: [office] Proposed text for ODF-Next "Call for Proposals"
From
Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 9 Feb 2009 13:52:17 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 9 Feb 2009 13:41:24 -0000
Re: [office] Proposed text for ODF-Next "Call for Proposals"
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Feb 2009 13:40:37 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Feb 2009 13:17:25 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 9 Feb 2009 12:38:02 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Feb 2009 12:22:16 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Feb 2009 12:18:40 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Feb 2009 12:07:15 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 9 Feb 2009 11:54:22 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Feb 2009 11:46:51 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 9 Feb 2009 11:29:00 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 9 Feb 2009 11:09:50 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 9 Feb 2009 11:03:40 -0000
Re: Res: RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 9 Feb 2009 11:00:38 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Feb 2009 10:57:18 -0000
Re: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Feb 2009 09:41:23 -0000
Conformance Clause Proposal: Clarifications, Extension features
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 9 Feb 2009 09:33:55 -0000
RE: [office] Analysis: What Is the ODF Specification Conformance Proflie?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2009 06:34:39 -0000
RE: [office] Re: Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2009 06:20:52 -0000
RE: RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2009 06:20:51 -0000
Re: [office] Analysis: What Is the ODF Specification ConformanceProflie?
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 9 Feb 2009 04:39:20 -0000
Analysis: What Is the ODF Specification Conformance Proflie?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2009 04:23:03 -0000
RE: [office] Moving forward on Conformance - OIC Role
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 9 Feb 2009 04:23:00 -0000
Res: RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Jomar Silva" <jomar.silva@br.odfalliance.org> on 9 Feb 2009 00:19:37 -0000
RE: [office] Re: Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Feb 2009 21:55:32 -0000
RE: [office] Re: Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 8 Feb 2009 20:03:38 -0000
RE: [office] Strict Conformance
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 8 Feb 2009 20:03:37 -0000
Re: Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Feb 2009 17:39:24 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Feb 2009 17:39:24 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 8 Feb 2009 01:10:27 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 7 Feb 2009 18:52:13 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 7 Feb 2009 18:14:29 -0000
Spreadsheet Formula Conformance - Please Not Now
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 7 Feb 2009 18:14:26 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 7 Feb 2009 16:50:51 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 7 Feb 2009 16:37:25 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 7 Feb 2009 16:10:48 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"David A. Wheeler" <dwheeler@dwheeler.com> on 7 Feb 2009 15:16:37 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com> on 7 Feb 2009 13:39:40 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 7 Feb 2009 02:37:45 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com> on 7 Feb 2009 02:08:00 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 7 Feb 2009 01:47:57 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Andreas J Guelzow <aguelzow@math.concordia.ab.ca> on 7 Feb 2009 01:47:05 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 7 Feb 2009 00:54:30 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 7 Feb 2009 00:15:57 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 6 Feb 2009 23:09:56 -0000
RE: [office] Re: ODF Conformance
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 6 Feb 2009 22:35:02 -0000
RE: [office] RE: [odf-adoption] Interest in ISO version of ODF 1.1?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 6 Feb 2009 19:58:00 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 6 Feb 2009 19:17:59 -0000
Re: [office] RE: [odf-adoption] Interest in ISO version of ODF 1.1?
From
Jomar Silva <jomar.silva@br.odfalliance.org> on 6 Feb 2009 16:41:20 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 6 Feb 2009 12:03:22 -0000
Re: ODF Conformance
From
David Faure <faure@kde.org> on 6 Feb 2009 10:18:51 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 6 Feb 2009 01:22:35 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 6 Feb 2009 00:20:55 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 5 Feb 2009 23:51:55 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 5 Feb 2009 23:14:21 -0000
RE: [office] OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda January 9th, 2008
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 5 Feb 2009 23:14:20 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 5 Feb 2009 23:10:21 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 5 Feb 2009 23:10:20 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 5 Feb 2009 23:03:32 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 5 Feb 2009 22:07:15 -0000
OpenDocument TC Coordination Call Agenda January 9th, 2008
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 5 Feb 2009 21:47:46 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 5 Feb 2009 21:47:33 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 5 Feb 2009 21:30:48 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 5 Feb 2009 20:14:40 -0000
Conformance Clause proposal, Version 8
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 5 Feb 2009 13:24:45 -0000
RE: [odf-adoption] Interest in ISO version of ODF 1.1?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 5 Feb 2009 00:08:26 -0000
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2009 23:55:18 -0000
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2009 23:36:46 -0000
Interest in ISO version of ODF 1.1?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2009 23:16:57 -0000
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2009 20:06:52 -0000
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2009 19:25:19 -0000
Nlnet Foundation to fund ODF projects
From
"Carol Geyer" <carol.geyer@oasis-open.org> on 4 Feb 2009 15:34:53 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 4 Feb 2009 11:11:26 -0000
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2009 06:03:51 -0000
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2009 05:51:11 -0000
RE: [office] A few of specific examples
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2009 04:46:30 -0000
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2009 04:46:30 -0000
Re: [office] A few of specific examples]
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 4 Feb 2009 02:43:43 -0000
RE: [office] Regarding Conformance Clauses
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2009 02:17:52 -0000
A few of specific examples
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2009 00:49:07 -0000
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 4 Feb 2009 00:49:06 -0000
RE: [office] Regarding Conformance Clauses
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 4 Feb 2009 00:17:40 -0000
RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Floor << Ceiling Already
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 3 Feb 2009 23:23:47 -0000
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 3 Feb 2009 23:23:43 -0000
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document? - Raising the Floor, not the Ceiling?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 3 Feb 2009 22:35:27 -0000
Re: [office] Moving forward on Conformance
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 19:30:07 -0000
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 17:18:46 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
"Charles-H. Schulz" <charles-h.schulz@arsaperta.com> on 3 Feb 2009 17:00:39 -0000
Re: [office] Moving forward on Conformance
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 3 Feb 2009 16:29:51 -0000
RE: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com> on 3 Feb 2009 16:15:48 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 3 Feb 2009 16:10:15 -0000
Another next step
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Feb 2009 16:08:57 -0000
svg:ideographic?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Feb 2009 16:05:46 -0000
Moving forward on Conformance
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 16:05:21 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 16:05:19 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Feb 2009 15:38:06 -0000
[office] OpenDocument TC coordination call draft minutes 2009-02-02
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 3 Feb 2009 15:28:03 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Feb 2009 15:03:57 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 14:49:14 -0000
18.4 amin:audio-level
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Feb 2009 14:43:53 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 3 Feb 2009 14:34:27 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Feb 2009 14:15:27 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Feb 2009 13:43:12 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 3 Feb 2009 13:08:10 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Bob Jolliffe <bobjolliffe@gmail.com> on 3 Feb 2009 13:03:25 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions - Clarification
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 3 Feb 2009 12:56:34 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions - Procedural Objection
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 3 Feb 2009 12:49:49 -0000
Re: [office] One strictly conforming document?
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 3 Feb 2009 12:12:04 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 3 Feb 2009 11:38:45 -0000
Re: [office] OASIS-SC34 ODF Maintenance Feedback?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 2 Feb 2009 18:39:58 -0000
OASIS-SC34 ODF Maintenance Feedback?
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 2 Feb 2009 17:56:36 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions
From
Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 2 Feb 2009 17:17:40 -0000
Proposed text for ODF-Next "Call for Proposals"
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 2 Feb 2009 16:28:40 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 2 Feb 2009 16:28:28 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Definitions - Clarification
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 2 Feb 2009 16:04:39 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Definitions - Procedural Objection
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 2 Feb 2009 15:44:34 -0000
Conformance Definitions - Procedural Objection
From
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <dennis.hamilton@acm.org> on 2 Feb 2009 14:51:21 -0000
One strictly conforming document?
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 2 Feb 2009 14:46:42 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 2 Feb 2009 12:42:53 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 2 Feb 2009 12:37:56 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions
From
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 2 Feb 2009 11:01:48 -0000
Re: [office] Conformance Definitions
From
Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> on 2 Feb 2009 08:43:24 -0000
RE: [office] Conformance Definitions
From
Doug Mahugh <Doug.Mahugh@microsoft.com> on 2 Feb 2009 02:15:16 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2