OASIS Mailing List Archives
View the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using
MarkMail
.
This list only
All OASIS lists
Help:
OASIS Mailing Lists Help
|
MarkMail Help
oiic-formation-discuss
864 messages in this archive
(listed by date, most recent first)
|
Thread Index
|
List Home
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective (purpose of=?UTF-8?Q?TCs=3F=29?=
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 1 Jul 2008 02:41:34 -0000
Moving forward
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 1 Jul 2008 02:24:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 1 Jul 2008 02:05:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 1 Jul 2008 01:51:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 1 Jul 2008 01:51:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Art Petrzelka <art@complum.com> on 1 Jul 2008 00:14:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 30 Jun 2008 23:07:56 -0000
OASIS Mailing List Policy and User Unsubscribed from the List
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 30 Jun 2008 23:02:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 22:59:25 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
"Ben Baston" <bbaston@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 22:57:22 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 30 Jun 2008 22:20:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 30 Jun 2008 22:09:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 21:56:02 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
"Ben Baston" <bbaston@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 21:51:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 30 Jun 2008 21:27:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 30 Jun 2008 21:13:59 -0000
Profile of ODF + PDF
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 30 Jun 2008 21:13:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 30 Jun 2008 21:02:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 30 Jun 2008 21:00:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 30 Jun 2008 20:49:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Alexander Wright <alexander@silverfish-design.co.uk> on 30 Jun 2008 20:45:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 30 Jun 2008 20:41:46 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Alexander Wright <alexander@silverfish-design.co.uk> on 30 Jun 2008 18:08:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 16:27:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 30 Jun 2008 16:25:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 30 Jun 2008 16:08:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 30 Jun 2008 16:00:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 30 Jun 2008 15:47:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 15:31:29 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 30 Jun 2008 15:30:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 30 Jun 2008 15:19:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 30 Jun 2008 15:19:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 15:14:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 14:56:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
"Gordon MacGinitie" <gmacginitie@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 14:01:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
"Charles-H. Schulz" <charles-h.schulz@arsaperta.com> on 30 Jun 2008 13:44:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 13:34:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 30 Jun 2008 13:16:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 30 Jun 2008 13:13:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 30 Jun 2008 12:53:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 12:36:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 12:24:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 12:23:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Matthew Holloway <hollowaynz@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 12:10:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 11:43:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 30 Jun 2008 11:27:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 30 Jun 2008 11:27:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 11:26:02 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 11:04:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 11:02:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Alexander Wright <alexander@silverfish-design.co.uk> on 30 Jun 2008 10:59:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 10:44:46 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 30 Jun 2008 10:20:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 09:26:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 30 Jun 2008 08:48:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 30 Jun 2008 08:23:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 30 Jun 2008 08:15:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 08:15:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 08:03:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. Extensions
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 07:20:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective. display perferct?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 07:14:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
Pamela Jones <pj2@groklaw.net> on 30 Jun 2008 06:52:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 30 Jun 2008 06:51:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 30 Jun 2008 06:44:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 02:41:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 02:15:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 01:28:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 30 Jun 2008 00:08:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] My perspective
From
"Gordon MacGinitie" <gmacginitie@gmail.com> on 29 Jun 2008 22:26:55 -0000
My perspective
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 29 Jun 2008 21:34:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 29 Jun 2008 19:04:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
"dario balozzi" <dbalozzi@gmail.com> on 29 Jun 2008 14:34:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 29 Jun 2008 10:53:02 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
Alexander Wright <alexander@silverfish-design.co.uk> on 29 Jun 2008 09:12:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 29 Jun 2008 08:15:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 29 Jun 2008 07:55:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 29 Jun 2008 06:27:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 29 Jun 2008 06:05:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 29 Jun 2008 03:44:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 29 Jun 2008 01:57:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
Matthew Holloway <hollowaynz@gmail.com> on 29 Jun 2008 01:00:48 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
Alan Lord <alanslists@googlemail.com> on 29 Jun 2008 00:11:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 29 Jun 2008 00:00:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
Sunny Dubey <sunny@audiowiki.org> on 28 Jun 2008 23:54:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
"Michael Shaw" <ancalagon555@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 23:50:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 23:38:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
"Ben Baston" <bbaston@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 21:54:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Hijacked?
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 28 Jun 2008 21:52:49 -0000
Hijacked?
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 28 Jun 2008 21:46:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 28 Jun 2008 21:41:11 -0000
Can we turn on list moderation now?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 28 Jun 2008 21:37:56 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 28 Jun 2008 21:04:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 20:42:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 20:40:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 19:59:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 28 Jun 2008 19:45:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Thomas Zander <zander@kde.org> on 28 Jun 2008 18:23:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 18:08:58 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 17:53:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation, Interoperability and Conformance
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 17:27:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation, Interoperability andConformance
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 28 Jun 2008 17:20:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation, Interoperability and Conformance
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 16:55:27 -0000
Implementation, Interoperability and Conformance
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 28 Jun 2008 16:20:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 28 Jun 2008 13:45:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 28 Jun 2008 13:39:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 12:19:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 11:42:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 11:11:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 10:54:52 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 28 Jun 2008 10:28:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 28 Jun 2008 10:16:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 28 Jun 2008 10:04:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 09:48:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 28 Jun 2008 03:29:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Purpose of List
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 28 Jun 2008 00:49:17 -0000
Purpose of List
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 28 Jun 2008 00:31:48 -0000
The basic skeleton of an architecture for profiles
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 28 Jun 2008 00:19:46 -0000
The basic skeleton of an architecture for profiles
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 28 Jun 2008 00:19:22 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 27 Jun 2008 21:42:42 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 27 Jun 2008 20:35:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 27 Jun 2008 17:09:25 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 27 Jun 2008 16:15:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 27 Jun 2008 15:24:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 27 Jun 2008 14:39:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 27 Jun 2008 12:09:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 27 Jun 2008 10:34:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 27 Jun 2008 08:49:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 27 Jun 2008 08:05:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 26 Jun 2008 23:22:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 26 Jun 2008 15:44:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 26 Jun 2008 14:58:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 26 Jun 2008 14:55:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 26 Jun 2008 14:03:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability invertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 26 Jun 2008 13:29:18 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 26 Jun 2008 12:49:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 26 Jun 2008 12:42:44 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 26 Jun 2008 12:31:38 -0000
Proposed Use case -- Interoperability in vertical and horizontal ODF markets
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 26 Jun 2008 10:55:11 -0000
Canonical mappings.. let's start!
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 25 Jun 2008 17:48:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] List of ODF interop issues that needto be addressed -- Electronic signatures
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 25 Jun 2008 13:53:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] List of ODF interop issues that need to beaddressed -- Electronic signatures
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 25 Jun 2008 12:48:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] List of ODF interop issues that need to be addressed -- Electronic signatures
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 25 Jun 2008 10:06:21 -0000
Re: List of ODF interop issues that need to be addressed -- Electronic signatures
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 25 Jun 2008 00:55:37 -0000
List of ODF interop issues that need to be addressed -- Electronic signatures
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 25 Jun 2008 00:39:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 19:14:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 18:57:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 18:41:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 24 Jun 2008 17:41:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Canonicalizations galore
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 24 Jun 2008 17:36:28 -0000
Canonicalizations galore
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 16:32:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 24 Jun 2008 11:59:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Use Cases
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 24 Jun 2008 08:17:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 24 Jun 2008 08:11:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Features, abstract features, and precise element semantics to limit lock-in
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 24 Jun 2008 07:39:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 24 Jun 2008 07:08:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Use Cases
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 24 Jun 2008 06:45:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 24 Jun 2008 06:37:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary of some "profiles" usage and ideas
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 05:38:11 -0000
Summary of some "profiles" usage and ideas
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 05:00:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Features, abstract features, and precise element semantics to limit lock-in
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 04:12:54 -0000
Features, abstract features, and precise element semantics to limit lock-in
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 03:43:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 01:22:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 24 Jun 2008 01:00:52 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC
From
"Michael Shaw" <ancalagon555@gmail.com> on 24 Jun 2008 00:08:02 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 23:55:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 23:13:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 23 Jun 2008 22:01:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 23 Jun 2008 21:51:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] #oiic IRC Channel now being logged and archived
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 23 Jun 2008 21:34:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Use Cases
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 23 Jun 2008 21:32:29 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 23 Jun 2008 21:16:58 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing ConformanceClauses
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 21:08:25 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 23 Jun 2008 20:38:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing Conformance Clauses
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 23 Jun 2008 19:42:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing Conformance Clauses
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 23 Jun 2008 18:39:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 18:36:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 18:27:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 23 Jun 2008 18:23:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 18:07:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 18:03:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Test priority
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 17:59:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 17:47:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 17:47:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 17:25:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 17:21:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 17:21:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Test priority
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 17:21:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing ConformanceClauses
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 17:21:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 17:21:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 16:04:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 15:59:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 15:48:46 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 15:48:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Standards and Antitrust
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 23 Jun 2008 15:14:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] OASIS Guidelines to Writing Conformance Clauses
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 14:22:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 14:17:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 14:14:10 -0000
OASIS Guidelines to Writing Conformance Clauses
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 14:00:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 14:00:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 14:00:46 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 14:00:44 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 14:00:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Open formula group, and getting ahead ofourselves?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 14:00:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Standards and Antitrust
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 23 Jun 2008 12:58:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Use Cases
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 12:33:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 12:30:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 12:28:58 -0000
Standards and Antitrust
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 12:23:14 -0000
OASIS Test Assertions Guidelines (TAG) TC
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 12:23:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Spreadsheets and the OpenFormula group
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 12:23:06 -0000
Use Cases
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 23 Jun 2008 12:23:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 23 Jun 2008 12:05:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 11:37:25 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in,who is out?
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 23 Jun 2008 11:35:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Informative clauses
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 23 Jun 2008 11:13:00 -0000
Test priority
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 10:27:32 -0000
Informative clauses
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 10:18:56 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 10:10:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 23 Jun 2008 09:41:25 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 23 Jun 2008 09:34:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered
From
Roy Schestowitz <r@schestowitz.com> on 23 Jun 2008 08:18:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] #oiic IRC Channel now being logged andarchived
From
Roy Schestowitz <r@schestowitz.com> on 23 Jun 2008 08:16:53 -0000
Text archive creator script available
From
Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@fastmail.fm> on 23 Jun 2008 07:31:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 07:29:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] #oiic IRC Channel now being logged andarchived
From
Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@fastmail.fm> on 23 Jun 2008 07:12:56 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 07:12:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 23 Jun 2008 05:22:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 23 Jun 2008 02:24:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 22:10:44 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 22 Jun 2008 21:24:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 22 Jun 2008 21:21:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 22 Jun 2008 21:10:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Feedback to the ODF TC
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 22 Jun 2008 20:57:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 18:53:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 17:13:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 17:02:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 15:36:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 15:24:44 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 15:09:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 14:55:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 14:14:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 14:09:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 14:02:49 -0000
Feedback to the ODF TC
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 11:57:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 11:12:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 22 Jun 2008 10:17:52 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 10:14:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 22 Jun 2008 09:59:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 22 Jun 2008 09:52:32 -0000
Open formula group, and getting ahead of ourselves?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 08:31:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 07:08:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 22 Jun 2008 06:56:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting...
From
"Gordon MacGinitie" <gmacginitie@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 21:44:29 -0000
IRC Channel created and registered
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 21 Jun 2008 21:40:08 -0000
Profiles: suggested use-cases
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 21 Jun 2008 21:29:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <s.marechal@jejik.com> on 21 Jun 2008 20:25:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting...
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 21 Jun 2008 19:32:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 21 Jun 2008 19:18:44 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting...
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 21 Jun 2008 18:20:45 -0000
The 80K pound gorilla .. let's keep the baby
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 21 Jun 2008 18:14:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Spreadsheets and the OpenFormula group
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 21 Jun 2008 17:24:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting...
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 13:27:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 12:53:33 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 11:45:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting...
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 21 Jun 2008 11:36:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
Sunny Dubey <sunny@audiowiki.org> on 21 Jun 2008 11:36:25 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles -- How much to detail in thecharter?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 21 Jun 2008 11:31:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 11:27:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 21 Jun 2008 11:14:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 21 Jun 2008 11:11:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 21 Jun 2008 11:07:34 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 21 Jun 2008 11:01:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 11:00:56 -0000
Spreadsheets and the OpenFormula group
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 09:31:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] IRC Channel created and registered
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 21 Jun 2008 09:30:16 -0000
Bedtime reading.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 09:06:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 09:06:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 07:24:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 07:22:27 -0000
IRC Channel created and registered
From
Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@fastmail.fm> on 21 Jun 2008 05:12:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 21 Jun 2008 02:29:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 21 Jun 2008 02:08:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 21 Jun 2008 00:30:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 20 Jun 2008 20:54:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC
From
Roy Schestowitz <r@schestowitz.com> on 20 Jun 2008 20:37:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting...
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 20:37:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 20 Jun 2008 20:36:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 20:20:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 20:20:41 -0000
Profiles -- How much to detail in the charter?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 20:20:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting...
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 20 Jun 2008 20:13:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thread cutting...
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 20 Jun 2008 20:02:10 -0000
Thread cutting...
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 20 Jun 2008 19:51:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 19:41:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 19:19:15 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 20 Jun 2008 19:13:36 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 20 Jun 2008 19:11:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 18:59:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 18:59:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 18:59:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 18:59:38 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 20 Jun 2008 18:49:32 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 20 Jun 2008 18:40:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 18:04:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 18:03:42 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 16:10:52 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 20 Jun 2008 16:01:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 20 Jun 2008 15:24:42 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 15:07:44 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 14:54:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 20 Jun 2008 14:54:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 14:54:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 14:48:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 20 Jun 2008 14:31:04 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 20 Jun 2008 14:30:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 14:30:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 20 Jun 2008 14:07:12 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 13:55:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 20 Jun 2008 13:28:20 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 20 Jun 2008 13:21:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 20 Jun 2008 13:01:27 -0000
ODF compatibility, alt. CDRF standards (was: The importance to users of documents looking the same)
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 20 Jun 2008 12:54:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 12:45:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 12:16:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 12:14:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 20 Jun 2008 12:04:18 -0000
Deliverable: odf-diff?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 20 Jun 2008 11:56:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 11:42:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 11:05:22 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 10:43:58 -0000
Deliverables. Summary.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 10:18:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 10:10:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 20 Jun 2008 09:58:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 20 Jun 2008 09:54:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 20 Jun 2008 09:49:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 09:45:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 09:42:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 20 Jun 2008 09:19:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 07:15:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 06:20:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 06:14:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 06:03:34 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 05:47:02 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 05:40:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 20 Jun 2008 05:25:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 19 Jun 2008 23:21:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 23:15:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 19 Jun 2008 23:06:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 19 Jun 2008 22:14:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 19 Jun 2008 21:45:42 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 19 Jun 2008 21:36:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Jun 2008 21:10:52 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Summary and Focus?
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 20:39:51 -0000
Summary and Focus?
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 19 Jun 2008 20:29:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 19 Jun 2008 20:26:52 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 19 Jun 2008 20:00:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Jun 2008 19:54:54 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 19 Jun 2008 19:19:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 19 Jun 2008 19:08:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
From
Radoslav Dejanović <radoslav.dejanovic@opsus.hr> on 19 Jun 2008 18:35:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 17:51:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 17:46:30 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 19 Jun 2008 17:39:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 16:53:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 16:46:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Jun 2008 16:27:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Jun 2008 16:27:46 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out?
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 19 Jun 2008 16:21:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
"Jon Tullett" <jon.tullett@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 16:10:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Jun 2008 16:09:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 16:04:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 15:59:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 19 Jun 2008 15:55:44 -0000
Joining the new TC -- Who is in, who is out?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Jun 2008 15:49:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Jun 2008 15:49:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Jun 2008 15:49:29 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 19 Jun 2008 15:21:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 14:11:34 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 19 Jun 2008 13:25:09 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 19 Jun 2008 13:03:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 19 Jun 2008 12:57:12 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 12:44:29 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 11:38:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 19 Jun 2008 11:18:33 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 10:56:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC
From
Matthew Holloway <hollowaynz@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 10:31:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documentslooking the same
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 19 Jun 2008 10:18:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 19 Jun 2008 10:07:48 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 10:03:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 09:51:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 19 Jun 2008 09:37:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 19 Jun 2008 09:33:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 09:31:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 19 Jun 2008 09:23:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 09:21:09 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 09:16:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 19 Jun 2008 09:09:39 -0000
irc
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 09:03:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 19 Jun 2008 08:59:09 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 08:48:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 08:31:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 08:01:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.)
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 07:20:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.)
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 07:13:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 19 Jun 2008 06:58:11 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 19 Jun 2008 05:20:29 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 19 Jun 2008 01:43:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 19 Jun 2008 01:12:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 19 Jun 2008 00:47:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles,et al.)
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 19 Jun 2008 00:30:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Question (2)(f) Member Section
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 19 Jun 2008 00:27:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles,et al.)
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 19 Jun 2008 00:15:42 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.)
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 18 Jun 2008 23:37:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
Sunny Dubey <sunny@audiowiki.org> on 18 Jun 2008 23:31:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 18 Jun 2008 22:52:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 18 Jun 2008 22:35:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 22:20:34 -0000
Question (2)(f) Member Section
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 18 Jun 2008 22:08:58 -0000
Question 2(a) Identification of Similar work
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 18 Jun 2008 22:05:18 -0000
Moving forward
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 18 Jun 2008 22:04:51 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 18 Jun 2008 22:04:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 18 Jun 2008 21:40:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposedTC
From
"Craig A. Eddy" <tyche@cox.net> on 18 Jun 2008 21:27:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 21:24:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 18 Jun 2008 21:16:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 18 Jun 2008 21:16:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 18 Jun 2008 21:16:07 -0000
PROPOSAL -- Name change for proposed TC
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 20:18:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.)
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 18:58:21 -0000
Implementation vs. result (CDRF, profiles, et al.)
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 18 Jun 2008 18:37:42 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 18:17:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 16:41:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 16:36:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 16:35:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 18 Jun 2008 16:32:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 16:20:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents lookingthe same
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 18 Jun 2008 16:16:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 18 Jun 2008 16:16:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 16:09:50 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 18 Jun 2008 14:49:34 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 14:33:44 -0000
The importance to users of documents looking the same
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 14:29:19 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 18 Jun 2008 12:56:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 09:20:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 18 Jun 2008 08:00:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 18 Jun 2008 06:59:50 -0000
TC Charter
From
"Gordon MacGinitie" <gmacginitie@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 21:30:29 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 17 Jun 2008 20:54:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 17 Jun 2008 18:54:01 -0000
Profiles. Attempting a definition.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 18:27:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> on 17 Jun 2008 17:28:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 17:10:46 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 17 Jun 2008 16:52:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 16:32:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 17 Jun 2008 16:07:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 17 Jun 2008 16:07:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 17 Jun 2008 16:07:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 17 Jun 2008 16:07:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 15:26:40 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 17 Jun 2008 15:13:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 14:57:25 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates.
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 17 Jun 2008 14:45:33 -0000
FW: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 17 Jun 2008 14:44:56 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 17 Jun 2008 13:40:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 13:25:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 13:05:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 17 Jun 2008 12:25:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 17 Jun 2008 12:02:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 17 Jun 2008 11:07:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
Matthew Holloway <hollowaynz@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 10:27:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 10:00:56 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 09:50:56 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 09:41:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Profiles
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 09:20:08 -0000
Profiles
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 17 Jun 2008 08:54:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 17 Jun 2008 08:12:33 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 07:33:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 06:47:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 17 Jun 2008 06:34:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 17 Jun 2008 06:27:10 -0000
CDRF-like wrapper to handle elements via profile whitelists
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 16 Jun 2008 22:05:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ACID, roundtrip and Odf generation
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 21:23:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ACID, roundtrip and Odf generation
From
"Henrik Sundberg" <storangen@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 21:06:32 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Proposal for Charter Requirements section, was Which is definitive odf?
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 16 Jun 2008 20:43:44 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ACID, roundtrip and Odf generation
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 20:30:02 -0000
ACID, roundtrip and Odf generation
From
"Henrik Sundberg" <storangen@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 20:15:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 16 Jun 2008 19:44:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 16 Jun 2008 19:38:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 19:36:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 16 Jun 2008 19:30:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 16 Jun 2008 19:26:19 -0000
The conduct of this list
From
Eduardo Gutentag <eduardo.gutentag@oasis-open.org> on 16 Jun 2008 19:08:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 18:59:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 16 Jun 2008 18:40:39 -0000
Proposal for Charter Requirements section, was Which is definitive odf?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 18:35:56 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 18:34:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 18:27:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 16 Jun 2008 18:25:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 16 Jun 2008 18:20:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 16 Jun 2008 18:19:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 16 Jun 2008 18:18:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Another comment, and a .gov constraint oninterop.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Jun 2008 18:11:07 -0000
CDRF
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Jun 2008 18:11:01 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 16 Jun 2008 17:51:02 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 17:33:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Jun 2008 17:26:27 -0000
Interop with other standards
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Jun 2008 17:26:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Which is definitive odf?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Jun 2008 17:26:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Jun 2008 17:26:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Jun 2008 17:26:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 17:16:39 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 16 Jun 2008 15:40:05 -0000
Another comment, and a .gov constraint on interop.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 15:38:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 15:19:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 15:14:59 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 16 Jun 2008 15:14:55 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.
From
"Hurley, Garry \(L&I - OIT\)" <ghurley@state.pa.us> on 16 Jun 2008 14:24:37 -0000
Which is definitive odf?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 14:23:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
Andrew.Updegrove@gesmer.com on 16 Jun 2008 12:56:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates.
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 16 Jun 2008 11:11:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 10:51:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 10:22:12 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 16 Jun 2008 10:12:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 09:56:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 09:30:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Alexander Wright <alexander@silverfish-design.co.uk> on 16 Jun 2008 09:29:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 09:25:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Jun 2008 09:20:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 16 Jun 2008 09:20:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 16 Jun 2008 08:45:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 16 Jun 2008 08:44:52 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, withprojected completion dates.
From
Sander Marechal <sander.marechal@tribal-im.com> on 16 Jun 2008 08:44:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Rob van Son <r.j.j.h.vanSon@uva.nl> on 16 Jun 2008 07:57:22 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 07:14:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates.
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 16 Jun 2008 06:58:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation strikes gold
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 16 Jun 2008 06:57:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation strikes gold
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 16 Jun 2008 06:37:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Marbux: Request for more detail
From
"Tom M." <m42tom-odf@yahoo.com> on 16 Jun 2008 05:58:11 -0000
Reference implementation strikes gold
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 16 Jun 2008 05:29:33 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Marbux: Request for more detail
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 16 Jun 2008 03:27:33 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Acid Test - Proof of Concept
From
Matthew Holloway <hollowaynz@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 03:09:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Moving forward
From
Sunny Dubey <sunny@audiowiki.org> on 16 Jun 2008 02:38:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Acid Test - Proof of Concept
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 01:39:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Marbux: Request for more detail
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 01:35:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Marbux: Request for more detail
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 16 Jun 2008 01:35:19 -0000
ODF Acid Test - Proof of Concept
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 16 Jun 2008 00:34:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 19:47:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 19:40:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER,OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Ted Powell <ted@psg.com> on 15 Jun 2008 19:18:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 15 Jun 2008 16:54:48 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 15:30:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 15:24:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 15:24:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Alan Lord <alanslists@googlemail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 14:10:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 12:28:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 11:14:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 10:53:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 15 Jun 2008 09:59:36 -0000
Moving forward
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 15 Jun 2008 09:39:12 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 08:22:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 08:16:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 07:48:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 07:43:41 -0000
Re: [Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.]
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 07:28:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 15 Jun 2008 04:19:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
"Vic" <oasis@beer.org.uk> on 15 Jun 2008 03:55:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 03:48:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Pamela Jones <pj2@groklaw.net> on 15 Jun 2008 03:38:49 -0000
Marbux: Request for more detail
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 15 Jun 2008 02:34:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
<m42tom-odf@yahoo.com> on 15 Jun 2008 01:47:33 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 01:12:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 01:02:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 15 Jun 2008 00:18:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 15 Jun 2008 00:14:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 23:43:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 22:54:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 14 Jun 2008 22:31:12 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 21:56:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 20:42:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] "Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 20:28:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 20:23:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 13:49:01 -0000
"Strictly conforming" is not related to "interoperable"
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 14 Jun 2008 13:37:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 14 Jun 2008 12:36:59 -0000
Re: [Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.]
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 14 Jun 2008 11:35:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 11:27:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 14 Jun 2008 11:01:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, ANDSUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 14 Jun 2008 11:01:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 10:43:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 14 Jun 2008 10:29:06 -0000
MARBUX POINT OF ORDER, OBJECTION, AND SUGGESTIONS No. 1
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 09:53:34 -0000
Re: [office-accessibility] Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 07:29:26 -0000
Re: [Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.]
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 07:13:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 14 Jun 2008 07:07:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 14 Jun 2008 01:54:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 22:49:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 13 Jun 2008 22:30:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 22:27:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 13 Jun 2008 22:20:56 -0000
List growth and new subscribers
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 21:36:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 21:12:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 21:12:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 13 Jun 2008 20:39:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 19:36:11 -0000
Re: [Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.]
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 18:51:59 -0000
[Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.]
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 13 Jun 2008 17:46:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Jerome Davies" <jerome.davies@pdghelicopters.com> on 13 Jun 2008 17:39:58 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Jerome Davies" <jerome.davies@pdghelicopters.com> on 13 Jun 2008 17:35:22 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 16:52:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 16:19:19 -0000
Level of detail needed in a TC Charter
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 16:16:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 16:16:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 15:23:02 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 15:23:02 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 15:07:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Classic test case
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 13 Jun 2008 15:01:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 14:30:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 13 Jun 2008 14:02:51 -0000
Classic test case
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 13:38:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 13:22:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 13 Jun 2008 13:19:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates.
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 13 Jun 2008 13:18:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 13:12:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 13:07:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 13 Jun 2008 13:02:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 12:57:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 12:44:34 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Reference implementation. Layout perfect.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 13 Jun 2008 12:39:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Thoughts on interop
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 12:29:00 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 12:27:09 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables,with projected completion dates.
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 13 Jun 2008 11:39:18 -0000
Thoughts on interop
From
Simon Calderson <caldersons@yahoo.co.uk> on 13 Jun 2008 10:02:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 09:21:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 08:51:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Luc Bollen" <luc.bol@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 08:33:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 08:09:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Luc Bollen" <luc.bol@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 07:55:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 07:54:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 07:37:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Luc Bollen" <luc.bol@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 07:25:56 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 07:00:53 -0000
Reference implementation. Layout perfect.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 06:49:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 06:29:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 13 Jun 2008 01:35:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 13 Jun 2008 01:07:44 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
"Jonathan Leffler" <jonathan.leffler@gmail.com> on 13 Jun 2008 00:38:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 13 Jun 2008 00:02:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 22:39:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@skynet.be> on 12 Jun 2008 22:35:41 -0000
Fwd: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Luc Bollen" <luc.bol@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 22:34:46 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 22:29:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Luc Bollen" <luc.bol@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 22:28:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 12 Jun 2008 22:18:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 12 Jun 2008 22:00:22 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.
From
Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch> on 12 Jun 2008 21:59:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 12 Jun 2008 21:28:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 20:02:42 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projectedcompletion dates.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 19:59:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 12 Jun 2008 19:54:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, withprojected completion dates.
From
Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@skynet.be> on 12 Jun 2008 19:46:00 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 12 Jun 2008 19:26:18 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch> on 12 Jun 2008 18:55:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 18:15:19 -0000
(1)(d) A list of deliverables, with projected completion dates.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 18:06:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 17:57:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 17:51:58 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 17:47:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 17:42:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 17:23:22 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 17:18:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 15:38:39 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 15:11:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Pixel Perfection (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language)
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 14:57:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 14:48:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 14:42:31 -0000
Pixel Perfection (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) --audience and working language)
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 14:33:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 14:31:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 14:20:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 14:12:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 14:09:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 14:03:56 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 14:03:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 13:59:48 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 13:54:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 13:54:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperabilityversus Conformity)
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 13:54:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 13:53:58 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 13:53:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 13:53:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 13:49:36 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 12 Jun 2008 13:42:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 13:40:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 13:32:30 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 13:28:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 13:28:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"Luc Bollen" <luc.bol@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 13:26:24 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 12 Jun 2008 13:21:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 13:21:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 13:21:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 13:00:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 12:53:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 12:50:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 12:49:09 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members?
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 12 Jun 2008 12:49:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 12:48:59 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 12:44:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"Luc Bollen" <luc.bol@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 12:36:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 12:34:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 12:28:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 12:05:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity)
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 11:49:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 11:29:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 10:23:08 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 10:23:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage
From
Maximilian Odendahl <info@sept-solutions.de> on 12 Jun 2008 10:11:12 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 10:05:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 10:00:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 09:55:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 12 Jun 2008 09:35:13 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 09:10:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 12 Jun 2008 08:47:34 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 07:35:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 07:18:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 07:11:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 07:02:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort - how we talk.
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 07:00:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
"Stuart A. Yeates" <syeates@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 06:10:58 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 12 Jun 2008 04:26:50 -0000
Microsoft, Intel now ODF TC members?
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 12 Jun 2008 03:36:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 12 Jun 2008 01:44:35 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 12 Jun 2008 00:19:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 23:40:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 23:40:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 23:40:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Interoperability Presentation
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 23:40:45 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 11 Jun 2008 22:40:08 -0000
Caution and Disclaimer on Interoperability
From
jose lorenzo <hozelda@yahoo.com> on 11 Jun 2008 22:32:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 11 Jun 2008 22:04:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 21:50:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 21:45:01 -0000
Acid Tests (was: Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versusConformity)
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 21:44:51 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 21:44:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 20:56:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 20:18:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 19:09:09 -0000
Re: Fwd: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 11 Jun 2008 19:01:14 -0000
Fwd: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 18:52:42 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 11 Jun 2008 18:46:29 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 18:45:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 11 Jun 2008 18:31:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Interoperability Presentation
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 18:19:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Group effort
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 11 Jun 2008 18:16:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Interoperability Presentation
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 18:15:25 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 17:16:24 -0000
Group effort
From
"RA Schinagl" <schinagl@fach-anwalt.de> on 11 Jun 2008 17:13:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 17:09:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF Interoperability Presentation
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 17:05:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 16:32:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 16:16:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Jerome Davies" <jerome.davies@pdghelicopters.com> on 11 Jun 2008 16:10:58 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 15:49:50 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Jerome Davies" <jerome.davies@pdghelicopters.com> on 11 Jun 2008 15:31:07 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 14:51:41 -0000
ODF Interoperability Presentation
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 14:42:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 11 Jun 2008 14:39:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and workinglanguage
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 14:19:42 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 11 Jun 2008 14:10:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 11 Jun 2008 13:57:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 13:54:01 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 13:51:19 -0000
(1)(f) and (1)(g) -- audience and working language
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 13:45:09 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 11 Jun 2008 13:45:03 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate.
From
"Charles-H. Schulz" <charles-h.schulz@arsaperta.com> on 11 Jun 2008 11:56:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate.
From
"Jerome Davies" <jerome.davies@pdghelicopters.com> on 11 Jun 2008 08:37:44 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Modeunder which the TC will operate.
From
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg <Michael.Brauer@Sun.COM> on 11 Jun 2008 07:51:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 11 Jun 2008 07:14:57 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Question on references
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 23:09:33 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] xml.com article
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 23:09:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode underwhich the TC will operate.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 23:09:31 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Question on references
From
Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@skynet.be> on 10 Jun 2008 19:19:29 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate.
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 10 Jun 2008 18:15:33 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Modeunder which the TC will operate.
From
Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@skynet.be> on 10 Jun 2008 17:56:26 -0000
Question on references
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 10 Jun 2008 17:49:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Modeunder which the TC will operate.
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 10 Jun 2008 17:39:21 -0000
xml.com article
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 10 Jun 2008 17:29:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] (1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate.
From
"Matthew Reingold" <matthewreingold@gmail.com> on 10 Jun 2008 17:04:37 -0000
(1)(e) Specification of the IPR Mode under which the TC will operate.
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 16:14:36 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Stuart A. Yeates" <syeates@gmail.com> on 10 Jun 2008 09:34:28 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 03:45:14 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Re-focusing on the proposed Charter
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 03:12:55 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Re-focusing on the proposed Charter
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 03:12:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 03:12:53 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 00:58:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 00:58:27 -0000
Related Resources
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 10 Jun 2008 00:58:26 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
marbux <marbux@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 23:25:40 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 9 Jun 2008 21:52:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org)
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 9 Jun 2008 21:50:09 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Re-focusing on the proposed Charter
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 9 Jun 2008 21:33:38 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Re-focusing on the proposed Charter
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 20:33:23 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org)
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 9 Jun 2008 20:29:10 -0000
Re-focusing on the proposed Charter
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 9 Jun 2008 20:02:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org)
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 9 Jun 2008 19:55:03 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org)
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 9 Jun 2008 19:46:54 -0000
ODF IIC Technical Committee Wiki (Google Apps at odfiic.org)
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 9 Jun 2008 19:02:29 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 9 Jun 2008 18:59:16 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@skynet.be> on 9 Jun 2008 18:51:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 18:47:10 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 9 Jun 2008 18:40:32 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 9 Jun 2008 18:25:34 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> on 9 Jun 2008 17:50:52 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 16:58:54 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"Henrik Sundberg" <storangen@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 16:58:39 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 9 Jun 2008 16:52:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 13:40:35 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 9 Jun 2008 12:34:36 -0000
Interoperability
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 11:56:46 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 07:48:06 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 07:39:20 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 07:29:22 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 07:25:19 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really?
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 9 Jun 2008 02:04:07 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Interoperability versus Conformity
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 9 Jun 2008 01:56:32 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 9 Jun 2008 01:47:46 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 9 Jun 2008 00:31:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed
From
"David Gerard" <dgerard@gmail.com> on 8 Jun 2008 23:55:41 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed
From
"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> on 8 Jun 2008 23:49:24 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed
From
Matthew Holloway <hollowaynz@gmail.com> on 8 Jun 2008 22:03:47 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Experts needed
From
"Charles-H. Schulz" <charles-h.schulz@arsaperta.com> on 8 Jun 2008 21:56:16 -0000
Experts needed
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Jun 2008 19:57:21 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Jun 2008 19:57:19 -0000
Interoperability versus Conformity
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 8 Jun 2008 19:57:15 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What is interoperability anyway / really?
From
Shawn <sgrover@open2space.com> on 8 Jun 2008 19:17:36 -0000
What is interoperability anyway / really?
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 8 Jun 2008 17:57:28 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why?
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 8 Jun 2008 17:39:52 -0000
Draft proposal, or brain dump
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 7 Jun 2008 13:41:11 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 7 Jun 2008 06:01:52 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 7 Jun 2008 05:56:46 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why?
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 6 Jun 2008 21:21:37 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why?
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 6 Jun 2008 20:17:44 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why?
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 6 Jun 2008 19:00:32 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] What are we validating and why?
From
Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@skynet.be> on 6 Jun 2008 18:07:07 -0000
What are we validating and why?
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 6 Jun 2008 17:02:27 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 6 Jun 2008 05:56:48 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 5 Jun 2008 20:39:43 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 5 Jun 2008 17:52:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 5 Jun 2008 14:13:04 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 5 Jun 2008 13:59:19 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 5 Jun 2008 06:40:30 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 4 Jun 2008 18:05:29 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 4 Jun 2008 17:56:02 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 4 Jun 2008 17:27:16 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 4 Jun 2008 17:20:23 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
Ian Lynch <ian.lynch@zmsl.com> on 3 Jun 2008 20:23:49 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Hello from Covington!
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Jun 2008 19:19:59 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Hello from Covington!
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 3 Jun 2008 19:13:17 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
"Dave Pawson" <dave.pawson@gmail.com> on 3 Jun 2008 18:14:05 -0000
Re: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@skynet.be> on 3 Jun 2008 18:12:42 -0000
Hello from Covington!
From
Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net> on 3 Jun 2008 17:53:35 -0000
RE: [oiic-formation-discuss] Welcome!
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 3 Jun 2008 17:37:42 -0000
Welcome!
From
robert_weir@us.ibm.com on 3 Jun 2008 15:40:46 -0000
OIIC / ODF and OASIS CAM specification
From
"David RR Webber \(XML\)" <david@drrw.info> on 3 Jun 2008 00:41:17 -0000
New OASIS Discussion List: oiic-formation-discuss
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 2 Jun 2008 21:30:25 -0000
test
From
"Mary McRae" <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> on 2 Jun 2008 21:04:23 -0000
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.5.0b2